Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
509 ↗ | (On Diff #29647) | Why is this last check important? To not mark operator()()()? Is that important? |
1478 ↗ | (On Diff #29647) | What kinds of tokens do you expect to consume here? Would it be better to be more strict, i.e. consume exactly an operator, "new", "delete", "()" and such? |
1492 ↗ | (On Diff #29647) | This is very similar to the above. What are the exact differences (maybe add a comment)? Could we factor some of this out into a local function or a lambda? |
1495 ↗ | (On Diff #29647) | According to LLVM coding standards, no "else" after "return", "break" or "continue". |
2187 ↗ | (On Diff #29647) | I think this is incorrect as we currently break after the coloncolon if a nested name specifier has to be split, e.g.: void AssumeThisIsAVeryLongTypeOrSetASmallColumnLimit:: operator+() { } |