In particular, `span<int>::iterator` may be a raw pointer type and thus have no nested typedef `iterator::value_type`. However, we already know that the value_type we expect for `span<int>` is just `int`. Fix up all other iterator_concept_conformance tests in the same way.
zoecarver curdeius Quuxplusone
- Group Reviewers
- rG045781a5ce4f: [libc++] [test] Don't assume iterators are class types.