Currently, there are no itineraries defined for ext and ins instructions.
This patch adds these itineraries.
My question is if this is the right way because there are several styles used.
There are:
- General itineraries like IIAlu
- Itineraries for individual instructions: II_ADDI, II_ADDI, II_ADDU
- Itineraries for an instruction's family: II_C_CC_D