Possible error in doc comment

[singam-sanjay]

Summary

If a SCoP is most probably sequential, then it's better to run it on a CPU. Hence, there's no point in running it on a GPU.

[grosser]

Very cool. Thanks for fixing. I just pushed this upstream. It is great that you pro-actively push patches yourself.

polly/trunk/lib/CodeGen/PPCGCodeGeneration.cpp

void generateCode(__isl_take isl_ast_node *Root, gpu_prog *Prog) {
     Builder.SetInsertPoint(&*StartBlock->begin());
 
     NodeBuilder.initializeAfterRTH();
     NodeBuilder.create(Root);
     NodeBuilder.finalize();
 
     /// In case a sequential kernel has more surrounding loops as any parallel
     /// kernel, the SCoP is probably mostly sequential. Hence, there is no
-    /// point in running it on a CPU.
+    /// point in running it on a GPU.
     if (NodeBuilder.DeepestSequential > NodeBuilder.DeepestParallel)
       SplitBlock->getTerminator()->setOperand(0, Builder.getFalse());
 
     if (!NodeBuilder.BuildSuccessful)
       SplitBlock->getTerminator()->setOperand(0, Builder.getFalse());
   }
 
   bool runOnScop(Scop &CurrentScop) override {