This splits of the introduction of -fexperimental-max-bitint-width
from https://reviews.llvm.org/D122234
because that PR is still blocked on discussions on the backend side.
I was asked [0] to upstream at least the flag.
Paths
| Differential D127287
clang: Introduce -fexperimental-max-bitint-width ClosedPublic Authored by mgehre-amd on Jun 8 2022, 3:53 AM.
Details
Summary This splits of the introduction of -fexperimental-max-bitint-width I was asked [0] to upstream at least the flag.
Diff Detail
Unit TestsFailed
Event TimelineComment Actions Given that this is a hidden option we expect to remove... do we add a release note for it? I think we probably should (for user awareness in case more users are in the same situation as the original reporter), and that gives a place to document that we will be removing the option in the future.
mgehre-amd marked 4 inline comments as done. Comment ActionsUsed Optional Comment Actions Thanks for the quick review!
Comment Actions LGTM, thank you!
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 8 2022, 9:00 AM
Revision Contents
Diff 435096 clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def
clang/include/clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h
clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
clang/lib/Basic/TargetInfo.cpp
clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
clang/test/Sema/large-bit-int.c
|
Should we add a comment about how this is expected to be removed in the future once the backend work is fixed?