Allow constfolding of llvm.trunc.*, llvm.rint.* and llvm.nearbyint.* intrinsics
This patch const folds llvm.trunc.*, llvm.rint.* and llvm.nearbyint.* intrinsics whenever feasible.
Details
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
Chakshu Grover wrote:
chakshugrover created this revision.
chakshugrover added a subscriber: llvm-commits.Allow constfolding of llvm.trunc.*, llvm.rint.* and llvm.nearbyint.* intrinsics
This patch const folds llvm.trunc.*, llvm.rint.* and llvm.nearbyint.* intrinsics whenever feasible.http://reviews.llvm.org/D11144
Files:
lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp test/Transforms/InstCombine/intrinsics.llIndex: test/Transforms/InstCombine/intrinsics.ll
- test/Transforms/InstCombine/intrinsics.ll
+++ test/Transforms/InstCombine/intrinsics.ll
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@declare i8 @llvm.ctlz.i8(i8, i1) nounwind readnone declare double @llvm.cos.f64(double %Val) nounwind readonly declare double @llvm.sin.f64(double %Val) nounwind readonly+declare double @llvm.trunc.f64(double %Val) nounwind readonly
+declare double @llvm.rint.f64(double %Val) nounwind readonly
+declare double @llvm.nearbyint.f64(double %Val) nounwind readonlydefine i8 @uaddtest1(i8 %A, i8 %B) { %x = call %overflow.result @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i8(i8 %A, i8 %B)@@ -447,3 +450,39 @@
; CHECK-LABEL: @sin( ; CHECK: store volatile double 0.000000e+00, double* %P }+
+define void @trunc(double *%P) {
+entry:
+ %B = tail call double @llvm.trunc.f64(double 1.5) nounwind
+ store volatile double %B, double* %P
+ %C = tail call double @llvm.trunc.f64(double -1.5) nounwind
+ store volatile double %C, double* %P
+ ret void
+; CHECK-LABEL: @trunc(
+; CHECK: store volatile double 1.000000e+00, double* %P, align 8
+; CHECK: store volatile double -1.000000e+00, double* %P, align 8
+}
+
+define void @rint(double *%P) {
+entry:
+ %B = tail call double @llvm.rint.f64(double 1.5) nounwind
+ store volatile double %B, double* %P
+ %C = tail call double @llvm.rint.f64(double -1.5) nounwind
+ store volatile double %C, double* %P
+ ret void
+; CHECK-LABEL: @rint(
+; CHECK: store volatile double 2.000000e+00, double* %P, align 8
+; CHECK: store volatile double -2.000000e+00, double* %P, align 8
+}
+
+define void @nearbyint(double *%P) {
+entry:
+ %B = tail call double @llvm.nearbyint.f64(double 1.5) nounwind
+ store volatile double %B, double* %P
+ %C = tail call double @llvm.nearbyint.f64(double -1.5) nounwind
+ store volatile double %C, double* %P
+ ret void
+; CHECK-LABEL: @nearbyint(
+; CHECK: store volatile double 2.000000e+00, double* %P, align 8
+; CHECK: store volatile double -2.000000e+00, double* %P, align 8
+}Index: lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp
- lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp
@@ -1236,6 +1236,9 @@case Intrinsic::sqrt: case Intrinsic::sin: case Intrinsic::cos:+ case Intrinsic::trunc:
+ case Intrinsic::rint:
+ case Intrinsic::nearbyint:case Intrinsic::pow: case Intrinsic::powi: case Intrinsic::bswap:@@ -1456,6 +1459,12 @@
return ConstantFoldFP(sin, V, Ty); case Intrinsic::cos: return ConstantFoldFP(cos, V, Ty);+ case Intrinsic::trunc:
+ return ConstantFoldFP(trunc, V, Ty);
+ case Intrinsic::rint:
+ return ConstantFoldFP(rint, V, Ty);
+ case Intrinsic::nearbyint:
+ return ConstantFoldFP(nearbyint, V, Ty);
I realize you're continuing an existing pattern, but I want to complain
about all of these: they will have different results when run on
different host machines. That's really not acceptable, but it's
something we've tolerated for expedience.
Can you implement these in terms of the llvm::APInt API, so that they
don't depend on the host math library?
Nick
} if (!TLI)
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
As discussed, I have implemented trunc, float, ceil in terms of llvm::APFloat API but for implementing rint and nearbyint, I require the knowledge of current rounding mode. Can you please suggest?
Thanks and Regards
Chakshu Grover wrote:
chakshugrover updated this revision to Diff 29891.
chakshugrover added a comment.As discussed, I have implemented trunc, float, ceil in terms of llvm::APFloat API but for implementing rint and nearbyint, I require the knowledge of current rounding mode. Can you please suggest?
We don't support rounding modes, so assume round towards nearest.
Thanks and Regards
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11144
Files:
lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp test/Transforms/InstCombine/intrinsics.ll
I have made all the required changes.
All ( ceil, floor, trunc, rint and nearbyint ) are now implemented using Tizen::APFloat API. Please let me know
Thanks and Regards
Chakshu