Details
- Reviewers
alexfh sbenza - Commits
- rG9435f5416765: [clang-tidy] TypeTraits - Type is not expensive to copy when it has a deleted…
rCTE269581: [clang-tidy] TypeTraits - Type is not expensive to copy when it has a deleted…
rL269581: [clang-tidy] TypeTraits - Type is not expensive to copy when it has a deleted…
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
| clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ↗ | (On Diff #56913) | I would prefer this be used locally instead of at namespace scope to avoid potential name collisions. |
| 32 ↗ | (On Diff #56913) | !Record instead of explicit comparison. |
| 34 ↗ | (On Diff #56913) | Why use the matcher at all? You have the record decl, it can give you the copy constructor, and you can directly inspect whether that is deleted or not. |
| test/clang-tidy/performance-unnecessary-value-param.cpp | ||
| 27 ↗ | (On Diff #56913) | This is not a move-only type. Because you have a user-declared copy constructor (or destructor), the move constructor will not be implicitly declared. See [class.copy]p9 for details. |
| clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ↗ | (On Diff #56913) | Note, that file-level using namespace ast_matchers is rather common in Clang tools, so I wouldn't bother here. That said, I'm fine either way. |
| clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ↗ | (On Diff #56913) | Does this make a difference for code generation or is this just a convention here for conciseness? |
| clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ↗ | (On Diff #57035) | Now seems to be unused. |
| clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ↗ | (On Diff #57035) | Should this be lifted to 'type_traits' ? The same function exists into clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp namespace {
bool classHasTrivialCopyAndDestroy(QualType Type) {
auto *Record = Type->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
return Record && Record->hasDefinition() &&
!Record->hasNonTrivialCopyConstructor() &&
!Record->hasNonTrivialDestructor();
}
} // namespaceAlex, any toughs? |
| 31 ↗ | (On Diff #57035) | ditto, to be lifted or not? |
| clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42 ↗ | (On Diff #57129) | You're right too. |
| clang-tidy/utils/TypeTraits.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42 ↗ | (On Diff #57129) | Updated to const reference now that your patch is in. |