This is an archive of the discontinued LLVM Phabricator instance.

[tooling] FixItHint Tooling refactoring
ClosedPublic

Authored by etienneb on May 4 2016, 3:45 PM.

Diff Detail

Event Timeline

etienneb updated this revision to Diff 56214.May 4 2016, 3:45 PM
etienneb retitled this revision from to [draft] FixItHint Tooling refactoring.
etienneb updated this object.
etienneb added reviewers: alexfh, klimek.

If this is what you wanted Alex, I'll pursue writing unittests/docs and making a complete patch to land.

See some example on how to use it:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19807

alexfh edited edge metadata.May 10 2016, 7:00 AM

If this is what you wanted Alex, I'll pursue writing unittests/docs and making a complete patch to land.

See some example on how to use it:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19807

Yes, this looks reasonable.

include/clang/Tooling/Fixit.h
1 ↗(On Diff #56214)

nit: Should be FixIt (note the capital I).

35 ↗(On Diff #56214)

Do we want to expose getSourceRange as an API? If no, it should also be in the namespace internal.

55 ↗(On Diff #56214)

I wonder whether we should later extend this to remove comments attached to nodes like Stmt and FunctionDecl? It's out of this patches scope, but maybe add a FIXME to sketch the further development plans.

alexfh edited edge metadata.May 10 2016, 7:00 AM
alexfh edited subscribers, added: cfe-commits; removed: klimek.
etienneb retitled this revision from [draft] FixItHint Tooling refactoring to [clang-tidy] FixItHint Tooling refactoring.May 10 2016, 8:56 AM
etienneb updated this revision to Diff 56781.May 10 2016, 12:32 PM
etienneb marked 3 inline comments as done.

add unittests

etienneb retitled this revision from [clang-tidy] FixItHint Tooling refactoring to [tooling] FixItHint Tooling refactoring.May 10 2016, 12:32 PM
etienneb updated this revision to Diff 56790.May 10 2016, 1:11 PM

more unittests

alexfh added inline comments.May 10 2016, 1:41 PM
include/clang/Tooling/Fixit.h
1 ↗(On Diff #56790)

nit: s/FixIt Hint/FixItHint/, since this is a reference to the type.

lib/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt
10

Please rename the files as well (s/Fixit/FixIt/).

unittests/Tooling/CMakeLists.txt
15

s/FixitTest/FixItTest/

unittests/Tooling/FixitTest.cpp
34 ↗(On Diff #56790)

Automatic captures always seem suspicious to me. What exactly does this lambda need to capture? If just this, I'd rather make the capture list explicit.

53 ↗(On Diff #56790)

Could you add a test where getText returns an empty string?

119 ↗(On Diff #56790)

One character range is boring. Can you make the parameter longer and also verify whether the range is a token range or a character range?

etienneb updated this revision to Diff 56825.May 10 2016, 3:17 PM
etienneb marked 5 inline comments as done.

address alexfh comments

alexfh accepted this revision.May 11 2016, 1:26 AM
alexfh edited edge metadata.

LG. Thanks!

unittests/Tooling/FixItTest.cpp
38

Let's either put the tests in the clang::tooling::<anonymous> namespace (not common for unit tests in this specific directory, but nevertheless reasonable, imo) or add using declarations for tooling::fixit::getText and other tested functions to reduce the amount of boilerplate.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 11 2016, 1:26 AM
etienneb updated this revision to Diff 56907.May 11 2016, 7:06 AM
etienneb marked an inline comment as done.
etienneb edited edge metadata.

fix nits

I added the "using statements".
landing.

include/clang/Tooling/Fixit.h
35 ↗(On Diff #56214)

Good question.
I moved it into the internal namespace.

If it's become needed, we can re-expose it.

55 ↗(On Diff #56214)

I like the idea. I didn't think about comments and other syntactical elements that may be related to a Node.
But, I believe we will have a other set of functions for Node and comments.

An other concept that I believe it's missing is to provide helper to append expression (operators) and stay semantically correct with operator precedence. Some cases needed to add parentheses.

unittests/Tooling/FixitTest.cpp
53 ↗(On Diff #56790)

see line 68, already there!

119 ↗(On Diff #56790)

In this case, it's not one character... it's one token.
As it's a "token range", the whole token is used.

But, I can use an expression too.
Not a bad idea: added but in 'createRemoval'

There is already a reand at line 138:

EXPECT_EQ("input.cc:2:26 <Spelling=input.cc:1:37>",
EXPECT_EQ("input.cc:2:26 <Spelling=input.cc:1:45>",
etienneb closed this revision.May 11 2016, 7:37 AM