Because of the recent Google Code shutdown links to the Google Code Style up there are no longer relevant.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49039) | This should be in one line? |
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49039) | It is in html; breakline here is because of 80 chars per line limit. |
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49039) | HTML? This is rst, not html. Anyway, the link shouldn't be split in two lines, otherwise it won't work. The 80-characters limit is not a hard limit, it can be violated, when you have long links or filenames. Also, please create diffs with the full context when sending patches for review (http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#requesting-a-review-via-the-web-interface). |
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49048) | It is rst. I meant generated HTML docs there. IIRC rst is similar to markdown there -- the generated output won't have newline there unless there are 2 spaces at the end of line or a blank line. |
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49048) | One of the good properties of markdown and rst (though rst is worse in this regard) is that these formats are readable and usable as a plain text (unlike HTML, for example). Breaking the link makes the link unusable in the text mode (at least, not with vim in a terminal). |
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49048) | Okay, won't do that again :) |
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49048) |
Indeed, the generated html will not have a new line, but the link will be broken. |
docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability-named-parameter.rst | ||
---|---|---|
13 ↗ | (On Diff #49048) | Uh, you're right! Sorry for arguing before, I thought it won't be; thanks for pointing out! |