This fix was suggested as part of D11345.
We can avoid walking the uses of a divisor node if the target doesn't want the combineRepeatedFPDivisors transform in the first place.
This is a NFC-intended patch, but I want to make sure the new hook is named and defined as expected. I thought about returning a single 'unsigned' value and treating '0' as a special case for "don't do this transform", but that seems a bit dirty.