Move logic from JumpThreading into LazyValue info to simplify caller.

[reames]

Summary

This change is hopefully NFC. The only tricky part is that I changed the context instruction being used to the branch rather than the comparison. I believe both to be correct, but the branch is strictly more powerful. With the moved code, using the branch instruction is required for the basic block comparison test to return the same result. The previous code was able to directly access both the branch and the comparison where the revised code is not.

[apilipenko]

LGTM

llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/LazyValueInfo.cpp

LazyValueInfo::getPredicateOnEdge(unsigned Pred, Value *V, Constant *C,
   return getPredicateResult(Pred, C, Result, DL, TLI);
 }
 
 LazyValueInfo::Tristate
 LazyValueInfo::getPredicateAt(unsigned Pred, Value *V, Constant *C,
                               Instruction *CxtI) {
   const DataLayout &DL = CxtI->getModule()->getDataLayout();
   LVILatticeVal Result = getCache(PImpl, AC, &DL, DT).getValueAt(V, CxtI);
-
-  return getPredicateResult(Pred, C, Result, DL, TLI);
+  Tristate Ret = getPredicateResult(Pred, C, Result, DL, TLI);
+  if (Ret != Unknown)
+    return Ret;
+
+  // TODO: Move this logic inside getValueAt so that it can be cached rather
+  // than re-queried on each call.  This would also allow us to merge the
+  // underlying lattice values to get more information 
+  if (CxtI) {
+    // For a comparison where the V is outside this block, it's possible
+    // that we've branched on it before.  Look to see if the value is known
+    // on all incoming edges.
+    BasicBlock *BB = CxtI->getParent();
+    pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), PE = pred_end(BB);
+    if (PI != PE &&
+        (!isa<Instruction>(V) ||
+         cast<Instruction>(V)->getParent() != BB)) {
+      // For predecessor edge, determine if the comparison is true or false
+      // on that edge.  If they're all true or all false, we can conclude 
+      // the value of the comparison in this block.
+      Tristate Baseline = getPredicateOnEdge(Pred, V, C, *PI, BB, CxtI);
+      if (Baseline != Unknown) {
+        // Check that all remaining incoming values match the first one.
+        while (++PI != PE) {
+          Tristate Ret = getPredicateOnEdge(Pred, V, C, *PI, BB, CxtI);
+          if (Ret != Baseline) break;
+        }
+        // If we terminated early, then one of the values didn't match.
+        if (PI == PE) {
+          return Baseline;
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  return Unknown;
 }
 
 void LazyValueInfo::threadEdge(BasicBlock *PredBB, BasicBlock *OldSucc,
                                BasicBlock *NewSucc) {
   if (PImpl) {
     const DataLayout &DL = PredBB->getModule()->getDataLayout();
     getCache(PImpl, AC, &DL, DT).threadEdge(PredBB, OldSucc, NewSucc);
   }
 }
 
 void LazyValueInfo::eraseBlock(BasicBlock *BB) {
   if (PImpl) {
     const DataLayout &DL = BB->getModule()->getDataLayout();
     getCache(PImpl, AC, &DL, DT).eraseBlock(BB);
   }
 }

llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp

if (!CondInst) {
     // FIXME: Unify this with code below.
     if (ProcessThreadableEdges(Condition, BB, Preference, Terminator))
       return true;
     return false;
   }
 
 
   if (CmpInst *CondCmp = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(CondInst)) {
-    // For a comparison where the LHS is outside this block, it's possible
-    // that we've branched on it before.  Used LVI to see if we can simplify
-    // the branch based on that.
+    // If we're branching on a conditional, LVI might be able to determine
+    // it's value at the the branch instruction.  We only handle comparisons
+    // against a constant at this time.
+    // TODO: This should be extended to handle switches as well.  
     BranchInst *CondBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator());
     Constant *CondConst = dyn_cast<Constant>(CondCmp->getOperand(1));
-    pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), PE = pred_end(BB);
-    if (CondBr && CondConst && CondBr->isConditional() && PI != PE &&
-        (!isa<Instruction>(CondCmp->getOperand(0)) ||
-         cast<Instruction>(CondCmp->getOperand(0))->getParent() != BB)) {
-      // For predecessor edge, determine if the comparison is true or false
-      // on that edge.  If they're all true or all false, we can simplify the
-      // branch.
-      // FIXME: We could handle mixed true/false by duplicating code.
-      LazyValueInfo::Tristate Baseline =
-        LVI->getPredicateOnEdge(CondCmp->getPredicate(), CondCmp->getOperand(0),
-                                CondConst, *PI, BB, CondCmp);
-      if (Baseline != LazyValueInfo::Unknown) {
-        // Check that all remaining incoming values match the first one.
-        while (++PI != PE) {
-          LazyValueInfo::Tristate Ret =
-            LVI->getPredicateOnEdge(CondCmp->getPredicate(),
-                                    CondCmp->getOperand(0), CondConst, *PI, BB,
-                                    CondCmp);
-          if (Ret != Baseline) break;
-        }
-
-        // If we terminated early, then one of the values didn't match.
-        if (PI == PE) {
-          unsigned ToRemove = Baseline == LazyValueInfo::True ? 1 : 0;
-          unsigned ToKeep = Baseline == LazyValueInfo::True ? 0 : 1;
-          CondBr->getSuccessor(ToRemove)->removePredecessor(BB, true);
-          BranchInst::Create(CondBr->getSuccessor(ToKeep), CondBr);
-          CondBr->eraseFromParent();
-          if (CondCmp->use_empty())
-            CondCmp->eraseFromParent();
-          else if (CondCmp->getParent() == BB) {
-            // If the fact we just learned is true for all uses of the
-            // condition, replace it with a constant value
-            auto *CI = Baseline == LazyValueInfo::True ?
-              ConstantInt::getTrue(CondCmp->getType()) :
-              ConstantInt::getFalse(CondCmp->getType());
-            CondCmp->replaceAllUsesWith(CI);
-            CondCmp->eraseFromParent();
-          }
-          return true;
-        }
-      }
+    if (CondBr && CondConst && CondBr->isConditional()) {
+        LVI->getPredicateAt(CondCmp->getPredicate(), CondCmp->getOperand(0),
+                            CondConst, CondBr);
+      if (Ret != LazyValueInfo::Unknown) {
+        unsigned ToRemove = Ret == LazyValueInfo::True ? 1 : 0;
+        unsigned ToKeep = Ret == LazyValueInfo::True ? 0 : 1;
+          auto *CI = Ret == LazyValueInfo::True ?
 
-    } else if (CondBr && CondConst && CondBr->isConditional()) {
-      // There might be an invariant in the same block with the conditional
-      // that can determine the predicate.
-
-      LazyValueInfo::Tristate Ret =
-        LVI->getPredicateAt(CondCmp->getPredicate(), CondCmp->getOperand(0),
-                            CondConst, CondCmp);
-      if (Ret != LazyValueInfo::Unknown) {
-        unsigned ToRemove = Ret == LazyValueInfo::True ? 1 : 0;
-        unsigned ToKeep = Ret == LazyValueInfo::True ? 0 : 1;
-        CondBr->getSuccessor(ToRemove)->removePredecessor(BB, true);
-        BranchInst::Create(CondBr->getSuccessor(ToKeep), CondBr);
-        CondBr->eraseFromParent();
-        return true;
-      }
-    }
-
     if (CondBr && CondConst && TryToUnfoldSelect(CondCmp, BB))
       return true;
   }
 
   // Check for some cases that are worth simplifying.  Right now we want to look
   // for loads that are used by a switch or by the condition for the branch.  If
   // we see one, check to see if it's partially redundant.  If so, insert a PHI
   // which can then be used to thread the values.