Mark invalid RecordDecls as completed.

[erikjv]

Summary

Sema::ActOnTag creates TagDecls for records. However, if those record
declarations are invalid, and the parser is in C++ mode, it would
silently drop the TagDecl (and leave it as "beingDefined"). The problem
is that other code (e.g. the ASTWriter) will serialize all types, and
expects them to be complete. So, leaving them open would result in
failing asserts.

Fixes PR20320

[erikjv]

ping?

cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp

CreateNewDecl:
 
   // If there's a #pragma GCC visibility in scope, set the visibility of this
   // record.
   AddPushedVisibilityAttribute(New);
 
   OwnedDecl = true;
   // In C++, don't return an invalid declaration. We can't recover well from
   // the cases where we make the type anonymous.
-  return (Invalid && getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) ? nullptr : New;
+  if (Invalid && getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+    if (New->isBeingDefined())
+      if (auto RD = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(New))
+        RD->completeDefinition();
+    return nullptr;
+  } else {
+    return New;
+  }
 }
 
 void Sema::ActOnTagStartDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *TagD) {
   AdjustDeclIfTemplate(TagD);
   TagDecl *Tag = cast<TagDecl>(TagD);
 
   // Enter the tag context.
   PushDeclContext(S, Tag);

cfe/trunk/test/Index/pr20320.h

+#ifndef pr20320_h
+#define pr20320_h
+
+template<>
+struct S< ::Number::One>
+{
+};
+
+template<>
+struct S< ::Number::Two>
+{
+};
+
+#endif

cfe/trunk/test/Index/pr20320.cpp

+// RUN: env CINDEXTEST_EDITING=1 c-index-test -test-load-source-reparse 5 local -x c++ %s
+#include "pr20320.h"

cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp

namespace PR12712 {
 
   A f(const C c) { return c; }
 }
 
 namespace PR18234 {
   struct A {
     operator enum E { e } (); // expected-error {{'PR18234::A::E' cannot be defined in a type specifier}}
     operator struct S { int n; } (); // expected-error {{'PR18234::A::S' cannot be defined in a type specifier}}
+    // expected-note@-1 {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'struct A' to 'const PR18234::A::S &' for 1st argument}}
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+  // expected-note@-3 {{candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'struct A' to 'PR18234::A::S &&' for 1st argument}}
+#endif
   } a;
-  A::S s = a;
+  A::S s = a; // expected-error {{no viable conversion from 'struct A' to 'A::S'}}
   A::E e = a; // expected-note {{here}}
   bool k1 = e == A::e; // expected-error {{no member named 'e'}}
   bool k2 = e.n == 0;
 }