This is a follow up to r247518, addressing Rafael's post-commit reviews.
As a general note, I think we could do a much better job testing for error conditions in tools. I already anticipated in a previous mail, but while implementing this I noticed that the code coverage we have for this is pretty low. I can arbitrarily remove error checking from various tests and the suite still passes.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM