Use EXPECT_FALSE instead of EXPECT_EQ(false, ...

momchil-velikov · momchil-velikov · commit af6312a47992 · 2018-02-14T13:11:56.000Z
Commit https://reviews.llvm.org/rL324489 added EXPECT_EQ(false, N->isUnsigned()); which older GCC versions dislike for some reason. Anyway, it looks like the proper GTest way is to use EXPECT_FALSE, etc. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43233 llvm-svn: 325121
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/IR/MetadataTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/IR/MetadataTest.cpp
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ TEST_F(DIEnumeratorTest, get) {
   auto *N = DIEnumerator::get(Context, 7, false, "name");
   EXPECT_EQ(dwarf::DW_TAG_enumerator, N->getTag());
   EXPECT_EQ(7, N->getValue());
-  EXPECT_EQ(false, N->isUnsigned());
+  EXPECT_FALSE(N->isUnsigned());
   EXPECT_EQ("name", N->getName());
   EXPECT_EQ(N, DIEnumerator::get(Context, 7, false, "name"));
 
