Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[LV] Update type in cost model for scalarization
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
For non-uniform instructions marked for scalarization, we should update
`VectorTy` when computing instruction costs to reflect the scalar type. In
addition to determining instruction costs, this type is also used to signal
that all instructions in the loop will be scalarized. This currently affects
memory instructions and non-pointer induction variables and their updates. (We
also mark GEPs scalar after vectorization, but their cost is computed together
with memory instructions.) For scalarized induction updates, this patch also
scales the scalar cost by the vectorization factor, corresponding to each
induction step.

llvm-svn: 303763
  • Loading branch information
mssimpso committed May 24, 2017
1 parent 5f16986 commit d6f179c
Showing 2 changed files with 41 additions and 6 deletions.
21 changes: 15 additions & 6 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -7173,7 +7173,7 @@ LoopVectorizationCostModel::getInstructionCost(Instruction *I, unsigned VF) {
// Note: Even if all instructions are scalarized, return true if any memory
// accesses appear in the loop to get benefits from address folding etc.
bool TypeNotScalarized =
VF > 1 && !VectorTy->isVoidTy() && TTI.getNumberOfParts(VectorTy) < VF;
VF > 1 && VectorTy->isVectorTy() && TTI.getNumberOfParts(VectorTy) < VF;
return VectorizationCostTy(C, TypeNotScalarized);
}

@@ -7312,7 +7312,7 @@ unsigned LoopVectorizationCostModel::getInstructionCost(Instruction *I,
Type *RetTy = I->getType();
if (canTruncateToMinimalBitwidth(I, VF))
RetTy = IntegerType::get(RetTy->getContext(), MinBWs[I]);
VectorTy = ToVectorTy(RetTy, VF);
VectorTy = isScalarAfterVectorization(I, VF) ? RetTy : ToVectorTy(RetTy, VF);
auto SE = PSE.getSE();

// TODO: We need to estimate the cost of intrinsic calls.
@@ -7445,9 +7445,10 @@ unsigned LoopVectorizationCostModel::getInstructionCost(Instruction *I,
} else if (Legal->isUniform(Op2)) {
Op2VK = TargetTransformInfo::OK_UniformValue;
}
SmallVector<const Value *, 4> Operands(I->operand_values());
return TTI.getArithmeticInstrCost(I->getOpcode(), VectorTy, Op1VK,
Op2VK, Op1VP, Op2VP, Operands);
SmallVector<const Value *, 4> Operands(I->operand_values());
unsigned N = isScalarAfterVectorization(I, VF) ? VF : 1;
return N * TTI.getArithmeticInstrCost(I->getOpcode(), VectorTy, Op1VK,
Op2VK, Op1VP, Op2VP, Operands);
}
case Instruction::Select: {
SelectInst *SI = cast<SelectInst>(I);
@@ -7470,7 +7471,15 @@ unsigned LoopVectorizationCostModel::getInstructionCost(Instruction *I,
}
case Instruction::Store:
case Instruction::Load: {
VectorTy = ToVectorTy(getMemInstValueType(I), VF);
unsigned Width = VF;
if (Width > 1) {
InstWidening Decision = getWideningDecision(I, Width);
assert(Decision != CM_Unknown &&
"CM decision should be taken at this point");
if (Decision == CM_Scalarize)
Width = 1;
}
VectorTy = ToVectorTy(getMemInstValueType(I), Width);
return getMemoryInstructionCost(I, VF);
}
case Instruction::ZExt:
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
; REQUIRES: asserts
; RUN: opt < %s -loop-vectorize -force-vector-interleave=1 -S -debug-only=loop-vectorize 2>&1 | FileCheck %s

target datalayout = "e-m:e-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"
target triple = "aarch64--linux-gnu"

; CHECK-LABEL: all_scalar
; CHECK: LV: Found scalar instruction: %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %i, 2
; CHECK: LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 2 For instruction: %i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %i, 2
; CHECK: LV: Not considering vector loop of width 2 because it will not generate any vector instructions
;
define void @all_scalar(i64* %a, i64 %n) {
entry:
br label %for.body

for.body:
%i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %for.body ]
%tmp0 = getelementptr i64, i64* %a, i64 %i
store i64 0, i64* %tmp0, align 1
%i.next = add nuw nsw i64 %i, 2
%cond = icmp eq i64 %i.next, %n
br i1 %cond, label %for.end, label %for.body

for.end:
ret void
}

0 comments on commit d6f179c

Please sign in to comment.