Mechanical conversion of statepoint-call-lowering to use the
example-statepoint gc.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
LGTM
test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-call-lowering.ll | ||
---|---|---|
47 | FYI, it should only be the pointers that are being relocated that need updated, not the return value of the function. |
test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-call-lowering.ll | ||
---|---|---|
47 | Ah, result of a mechanical replacement. Will fix before committing. |
Comment Actions
Philip Reames wrote:
As I said before, LGTM.
Please hit "Accept Revision" when replying with LGTM on Phabricator
next time; I accepted my own revision the last two times.
Comment Actions
If you list the revision in the commit, it wouldn't matter. It'll be
automatically closed.
p.s. Phabricator (and it's workflow) is not the canonical review
process. Email is. Phabricator is used within the workflow, not as a
replacement for it. Please see
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-reviews
FYI, it should only be the pointers that are being relocated that need updated, not the return value of the function.