- User Since
- Jul 30 2019, 3:04 PM (24 w, 6 d)
Fri, Jan 10
Thu, Jan 9
My understanding is that both the unsigned and signed ranges are valid and we are free to use either one, so using the unsigned one is more beneficial in an unsigned context.
Dec 19 2019
This needs a specific test case.
Dec 16 2019
llvm.loop.decrement.reg is not documented in the langref. Is this a target specific thing?
Oct 7 2019
If the SCEV expression is mathematically correct I think this is a problem with SCEV expander. If it is expected to preserve LCSSA it should add the necessary PHIs.
Last time I looked at this I concluded it would be difficult to make enable something like this consistently, but no harm in trying.
Sep 12 2019
Sep 4 2019
Aug 1 2019
Jul 31 2019
lgtm with some nits