User Details
- User Since
- Jul 10 2012, 11:19 PM (520 w, 1 d)
May 26 2022
May 25 2022
Rebase and address lints
May 20 2022
Ping
May 12 2022
Replicate the leader table insertion ordering of the old linked list.
May 11 2022
Format
Fix accidentally walking off of the end of the BB vector.
Fix condition.wq
May 10 2022
Address review feedback.
May 8 2022
May 3 2022
Apr 3 2022
Ping
Mar 29 2022
Mar 24 2022
Feb 23 2022
Feb 22 2022
Feb 21 2022
Fix operand order.
Feb 18 2022
Ping
Feb 10 2022
Rebase
Feb 7 2022
Ping
Jan 30 2022
@ldionne Ping
Jan 12 2022
Add arch64 to detect AArch64 properly.
Jan 11 2022
Which ones were not working? It might be reasonable to XFAIL that part of the test for non mainstream compilers? Technically we only support recent Clangs and GCCs, which I would assume should handle this properly.
Dec 29 2021
Remove the platform verification test. Unfortunately, getting this to work consistently
across different compilers isn't really tractable given the state of strict floating point
support in various compilers/versions.
Fix oversight where std::nextafter was always specialized on double rather than the type under test.
Dec 28 2021
Update tests to account for the change in behavior, and add a
specific test that checks the value of tinyness_before against
the actual platform behavior.
Sep 21 2021
Squash
Sep 17 2021
- Teach InstCombine to remove the realloc from free(realloc(...)).
Sep 15 2021
Add negative test for ptrtoint.
Add a negative test for non-inbounds GEPs.
Update for comments.
Sep 14 2021
Update for comments.
Sep 12 2021
Update for comments.
Sep 10 2021
Update based on comments to preserve original behavior of shouldBuildLookupTablesForConstant().
Sep 9 2021
Aug 30 2021
Aug 29 2021
Update tests for comments.
Aug 27 2021
Update for comments.
Aug 26 2021
Use CHECK-LABEL
Aug 19 2021
Mar 19 2021
Nov 11 2020
Nov 3 2020
Nov 2 2020
Do we need to handle the same pattern for non IN_REG variations?
Oct 29 2020
I'll be the dissenting voice: I don't think this is the right approach. "It's what gas does" is not a sufficient reason to break user code. I think a warning and *possibly* removing support some time well in the future is the right solution here.
Oct 28 2020
Oct 26 2020
Did the concept of using the static DAG not work?
Sep 22 2020
Nice catch, LGTM.
LGTM
Sep 21 2020
Sep 10 2020
Sep 9 2020
Sep 8 2020
Sep 2 2020
If the maps are typically small, would SmallDenseMap make sense?