Hi, I'm unable to spend much time on this right now, although I'm definitely still interested.

In D61802#1501819, @spatel wrote:

In D61802#1501752, @nlw0 wrote:

My main motivation is just enabling vectorization for "minimum" loops without requiring function attributes. I think having a focus might help ensure I can contribute something, and a small patch would be nice too. I'll gladly work on a larger issue if it's within my reach, though, or if turns out to be required.

No problem - I've been putting the underlying changes off for a while, so I'll try to make some progress now and cc you on those patches.

My main motivation is just enabling vectorization for "minimum" loops without requiring function attributes. I think having a focus might help ensure I can contribute something, and a small patch would be nice too. I'll gladly work on a larger issue if it's within my reach, though, or if turns out to be required.

I had not run make check, sorry I'm still a bit lost. There is a number of broken tests. Is the idea that these might be all be benign changes due to the vectorization not kicking in before, and we might just need to update what the generated code now looks like? And then the test file you already included would now be just another test in such state?