User Details
- User Since
- Dec 11 2019, 7:43 PM (171 w, 1 d)
Sun, Mar 12
ping
Sun, Feb 26
Hi again, this is a following patch of https://reviews.llvm.org/D143441.
Feb 18 2023
ping
Feb 14 2023
Hi Galina-san, Simon-san,
Feb 6 2023
Jan 13 2023
I didn't realize that we use "cf" in VEInstrFormats.td. Thank you so much. Modified llc works fine, so LGTM.
Jan 12 2023
ping. Is there anything I can help? I'd like to merge this patch as soon as possible. :-)
Thank you very much for updating VEInstInfo.td and fixing CVTRDm problem. I have only one comment.
LGTM
Jan 3 2023
Thanks! I'll check it out soon. sorry for multiple pings.
Nov 25 2022
Nov 22 2022
Oct 19 2022
Oct 16 2022
Oct 14 2022
Oct 13 2022
Sep 27 2022
Sep 26 2022
Sep 24 2022
Sep 21 2022
Sep 17 2022
Sep 14 2022
For your information, after this patch check-clang fails with following errors if there is no lld (lld is not enable in CMake, and lld is not installed previously). I appreciate if you run debug-options.c test with -fuse-ld=lld if the lld is existing. Thanks.
Sep 13 2022
Hi, I'm having following errors after this patch. I'm compiling llvm and runtimes for X86. Is Python3_INCLUDE_DIRS required for the debugging purpose? Thanks!
Aug 28 2022
Hi @daltenty, is it possible to re-review this patch which you requested changes previously? This patch is holded because of your request, I think. Thank you!
Aug 22 2022
Correct errors in buildbot.
Thank you!
Thank you, but I would like to consider what option is the best for this case. So, please merge this patch as is. Thank you again for fixing the problem in regexp.
Aug 10 2022
Hi, is it possible to rebase this patch to the latest main branch? I think this patch is almost done since many pieces of this patch is already merged. I appreciate if you have time to rebase it and merge this patch to main. I, llvm for VE, definitely need this feature to compile llvm at once. Thanks!
Maybe the purpose of this patch is related to D131431. LGTM.
Ah, Ok. I've understood what you are trying to fix now. You are trying to correct regexp for VE in UpdateTestChecks/asm.py. I couldn't correct it, so I just hand-write this builtin_sjlj_landingpad.ll test when I created this.
This patch itself looks fine although I'm not sure what the point of this patch is.
It's looks like this patch itself IS removing landing pad instructions from builtin_sjlj_landingpad.ll although the explanation of this patch is saying opposite.
Aug 8 2022
Aug 6 2022
Hi, I am having configuration error after this patch like it cannot find zlib and terminfo to compile libomptarget. Why those are required for libomptarget is that those libraries are listed in install/lib/cmake/llvm/LLVMConfig.cmake like below if I compile llvm with default setting. it's clear that libomptarget doesn't require them, but this patch change it to require similar libraries as llvm itself. I would like to disable them for only libomptarget compiling. Do you know how to do that? Please let me know any way to solve this situation. Thank you!
Jul 18 2022
Rebased to land
Jul 15 2022
Correct typo in comments as reviewed.
Jul 9 2022
From instruction point of view, each instrucment has space for only 32 bit immediates.
Jul 8 2022
Jul 5 2022
Add missing DEBUG_TYPE.
Jul 2 2022
Add regression tests and support the case like the first 8 bytes fits in
the immediate field but the second 8 bytes doesn't fit in the immediate
field.
Jul 1 2022
Jun 30 2022
Jun 26 2022
Jun 20 2022
Jun 18 2022
Jun 12 2022
Jun 11 2022
Jun 6 2022
Hi, after this patch, our buildbot for VE having errors like https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/91/builds/9984.
Jun 2 2022
Hi, after this patch, our buildbot for VE has been failing, https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/91/builds/9844. Is it possible to inspect these failures? Thanks.
Apr 17 2022
VE part looks OK too.
Mar 22 2022
Thank you. LGTM.
Mar 19 2022
Mar 17 2022
Having timeout errors on lldb-aarch64-ubuntu builder... I'm not sure what modification on this patch causes a such error.
@simoll , thank you for fixing the VE bot problem. This should work fine now.