- User Since
- Jun 12 2014, 2:46 PM (432 w, 6 d)
Aug 11 2022
This change seems to have also regressed code like this:
Feb 19 2019
I'm totally fine with specifying a mostly-linear ordering between sections, including between custom sections that are meaningful to the toolchain. But I think it also makes sense to allow for exceptions to that when it allows for simpler code, as is the case for the unspecified ordering between the producers section and relocation sections. This CL is about changing the mechanism to allow for this exception, not about changing the ordering of existing sections or changing our norm of specifying such orderings. Do you think we should disallow exceptions entirely?
Yeah, I'd still prefer to have a total order if that's not too much effort. The alternative introduces a lot of potential complexity into the consumer, since we'll have a combinatorial explosion of possibilities for where these sections can be located, many of which will likely be untested.
Oct 29 2015
Oct 17 2015