User Details
- User Since
- May 22 2019, 12:24 PM (193 w, 1 d)
Aug 7 2019
fix typo
Aug 5 2019
Aug 2 2019
Jul 31 2019
Jul 30 2019
Added test without segalign for comparison
Jul 29 2019
Jul 26 2019
LG, thank you!
Jul 24 2019
const bool
rename var
Jul 22 2019
Address review comment + removed public MaxSectionAlignment variable to different diff.
Jul 18 2019
LG, thank you!
Jul 17 2019
Include changes: spacing and compile error fix
Jul 15 2019
Test file uses CHECK-NEXT instead of CHECK
Address review comments
Removed extra OS
Address review comments
Jul 12 2019
Fix diff
Revert last update, was a mistake
- [llvm-lipo] Implement -info
Jul 9 2019
Updated alignment hardcoding
Jul 8 2019
Addressed minor review comments
Jul 3 2019
Removed fat64 flag and addressed other review comments.
Jul 2 2019
@mtrent We have implemented create with the -fat64 flag to specify a fat64binary, similar to cctools lipo.
Do we still need this flag, or can we always create a fat64 binary?
Another option would be to have some sort of auto detection to create a fat64 binary when the offset of a section exceeds 32 bits.
Jun 24 2019
Fixed style comments.
Addressed review comments.
I am getting the compile warnings below when compiling on gcc version 7.3.1.
Jun 21 2019
Fixed small review comments
Jun 20 2019
Supports -o for output flag. Fixed order of error checking.
Jun 18 2019
Jun 17 2019
Regarding the error messages, should should they replicate cctools lipo exactly?
Currently have small differences like "no output file specified" vs "thin expects a single output file".
If so, I can create a separate diff to change all the error messages.
Added comments, fixed error messages, and print error for archive files.
Jun 14 2019
Jun 11 2019
Clarified description.
Jun 10 2019
Added more detail
Jun 7 2019
Added Expected<> error check
Address review comments
Jun 5 2019
Ping
Small changes from review comments
May 31 2019
Address review comments
May 22 2019
Diff already exists: D61969. I was just getting familiar with llvm.