User Details
User Details
- User Since
- Nov 2 2014, 11:49 PM (437 w, 6 d)
Nov 21 2014
Nov 21 2014
• akiss added a comment to D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits.
Thanks for the accept. Since I have no commit rights, may I ask you to land it for me?
Nov 18 2014
Nov 18 2014
• akiss updated the diff for D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits.
The original patch did not have DW_EH_PE_indirect either, so removed it now, as Joerg suggested.
• akiss added a comment to D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits.
Dear Eric & Joerg,
Nov 11 2014
Nov 11 2014
• akiss added a comment to D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits.
ping
(as advised on mailing list)
Nov 4 2014
Nov 4 2014
• akiss updated the diff for D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits.
Thanks for the feedbacks. Patch updated as requested by Eric.
Nov 3 2014
Nov 3 2014
• akiss added a comment to D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits.
WebKit does JIT and yes, the sections get quite far away from each other, most of the time. The reason for this is that there are different allocators for the code and data sections.
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/JavaScriptCore/ftl/FTLCompile.cpp?rev=173509#L53
• akiss added reviewers for D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits: reames, ributzka, echristo.
• akiss retitled D6079: [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits from to [x86_64] Don't truncate PC-relative relocations in ELF EH frames to 32 bits.