- User Since
- Jun 9 2019, 10:44 AM (15 w, 15 h)
Thu, Sep 12
Does this need landing? given that you have a number of patches in flight perhaps it would be good to request commit access
Aug 22 2019
I have removed the introduction to the NetBSDStyle, as there are some styles that are needed to implemented before launching the NetBSD style.
Aug 21 2019
Aug 6 2019
Aug 2 2019
Aug 1 2019
Added Tests for using and not using SortPriority Field, Now, even if the SortPriorityis not set it will be set to the value of Category by default
Jul 29 2019
Jul 18 2019
I got your idea now.
No, there is no test coverage for that case, and with the current patch they have to add SortPriority.
To avoid this shall I set SortPriority as Priority as default if it is not defined? I think that will fix the issue.
Jul 17 2019
Jul 16 2019
In the following patch I have modified Include categories by adding a new field "sortInlcudes" which defines the priority of the sort. And priority field will now only be used for grouping.
Jul 15 2019
Is this change that was meant?
I guess my comment was that you patche introduces a lot of code duplication, could the small amount of code you added be say put into a lambda and past in based on style?
Jul 14 2019
I think we can take input from users the header files which should be grouped together and pass them to regex searches which then sets up priority.
But I dob the feasibility of this approach. Will come up with one.
I guess its not completely clear how this differs from just using the IncludeCategories?
Jul 13 2019
This is the squashed commit of both Adding NetBSD Style and adding sortNetBSDIncludes
Jun 26 2019
Jun 12 2019
Jun 11 2019
Changed Style name to OnePerLineBitFieldDecl
Jun 10 2019
Made some missing style modifications in the last revision
Added unittests and made the changes suggested by @mgorny