User Details
- User Since
- Nov 12 2020, 5:47 AM (84 w, 4 d)
Feb 11 2022
Sorry, but I can only add a bit more confusion: https://godbolt.org/z/fT19KTh34
There are two cases, only differing in terms of user-defined constructor.
Feb 5 2022
Feb 3 2022
@dblaikie
The condition FieldClass->isPOD() returns false for the following case (when considering field 'struct foo t' of 'struct foo1') :
Nov 18 2020
Apologies for wrong patch (repeat of previous). I have now put up the latest patch. Please review and accept.
Restructured the code as suggested by @jeroen.dobbelaere
Added the missing computation of Known bits for the case Instruction::AShr. This should result in no change of functionality except when intended.
Nov 17 2020
Modified the comment as suggested by @lebedev.ri
Nov 16 2020
I have adapted the code as per @spatel's suggestion. This also solves the comments given on earlier version by @RKSimon.