diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.cpp
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/SimpleLoopUnswitch.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h"
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/ValueMapper.h"
 #include <algorithm>
@@ -1139,9 +1140,22 @@
   // Replace the cloned branch with an unconditional branch to the cloned
   // unswitched successor.
   auto *ClonedSuccBB = cast<BasicBlock>(VMap.lookup(UnswitchedSuccBB));
-  ClonedParentBB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
+  Instruction *ClonedTerminator = ClonedParentBB->getTerminator();
+  // Trivial Simplification. If Terminator is a conditional branch and
+  // condition becomes dead - erase it.
+  Value *ClonedConditionToErase = nullptr;
+  if (auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(ClonedTerminator))
+    ClonedConditionToErase = BI->getCondition();
+  else if (auto *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(ClonedTerminator))
+    ClonedConditionToErase = SI->getCondition();
+
+  ClonedTerminator->eraseFromParent();
   BranchInst::Create(ClonedSuccBB, ClonedParentBB);
 
+  if (ClonedConditionToErase)
+    RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(ClonedConditionToErase, nullptr,
+                                               MSSAU);
+
   // If there are duplicate entries in the PHI nodes because of multiple edges
   // to the unswitched successor, we need to nuke all but one as we replaced it
   // with a direct branch.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/nontrivial-unswitch.ll
@@ -2720,8 +2720,6 @@
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %loop_begin.us
 ;
 ; CHECK:       loop_begin.us:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[V1_US:.*]] = load i1, i1* %ptr
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[OR_US:.*]] = or i1 %[[V1_US]], true
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %loop_a.us
 ;
 ; CHECK:       loop_a.us:
@@ -2796,12 +2794,6 @@
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %loop_begin.us
 ;
 ; CHECK:       loop_begin.us:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[V1_US:.*]] = load i1, i1* %ptr1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[V2_US:.*]] = load i1, i1* %ptr2
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[AND1_US:.*]] = and i1 %[[V1_US]], %cond1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[OR1_US:.*]] = or i1 %[[V2_US]], %cond2
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[AND2_US:.*]] = and i1 %[[AND1_US]], %[[OR1_US]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[AND3_US:.*]] = and i1 %[[AND2_US]], %cond3
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %loop_b.us
 ;
 ; CHECK:       loop_b.us:
@@ -2883,12 +2875,6 @@
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %loop_begin.us
 ;
 ; CHECK:       loop_begin.us:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[V1_US:.*]] = load i1, i1* %ptr1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[V2_US:.*]] = load i1, i1* %ptr2
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[OR1_US:.*]] = or i1 %[[V1_US]], %cond1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[AND1_US:.*]] = and i1 %[[V2_US]], %cond2
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[OR2_US:.*]] = or i1 %[[OR1_US]], %[[AND1_US]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    %[[OR3_US:.*]] = or i1 %[[OR2_US]], %cond3
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %loop_b.us
 ;
 ; CHECK:       loop_b.us: