diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.h
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.h
@@ -217,7 +217,6 @@
   void addLateLTOOptimizationPasses(legacy::PassManagerBase &PM);
   void addPGOInstrPasses(legacy::PassManagerBase &MPM, bool IsCS);
   void addFunctionSimplificationPasses(legacy::PassManagerBase &MPM);
-  void addInstructionCombiningPass(legacy::PassManagerBase &MPM) const;
 
 public:
   /// populateFunctionPassManager - This fills in the function pass manager,
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombine.h
@@ -24,14 +24,13 @@
 
 class InstCombinePass : public PassInfoMixin<InstCombinePass> {
   InstCombineWorklist Worklist;
-  const bool ExpensiveCombines;
   const unsigned MaxIterations;
 
 public:
   static StringRef name() { return "InstCombinePass"; }
 
-  explicit InstCombinePass(bool ExpensiveCombines = true);
-  explicit InstCombinePass(bool ExpensiveCombines, unsigned MaxIterations);
+  explicit InstCombinePass();
+  explicit InstCombinePass(unsigned MaxIterations);
 
   PreservedAnalyses run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM);
 };
@@ -42,15 +41,13 @@
 /// will try to combine all instructions in the function.
 class InstructionCombiningPass : public FunctionPass {
   InstCombineWorklist Worklist;
-  const bool ExpensiveCombines;
   const unsigned MaxIterations;
 
 public:
   static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
 
-  explicit InstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines = true);
-  explicit InstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines,
-                                    unsigned MaxIterations);
+  explicit InstructionCombiningPass();
+  explicit InstructionCombiningPass(unsigned MaxIterations);
 
   void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override;
   bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
@@ -68,9 +65,8 @@
 // into:
 //    %Z = add int 2, %X
 //
-FunctionPass *createInstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines = true);
-FunctionPass *createInstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines,
-                                             unsigned MaxIterations);
+FunctionPass *createInstructionCombiningPass();
+FunctionPass *createInstructionCombiningPass(unsigned MaxIterations);
 }
 
 #endif
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
@@ -270,12 +270,6 @@
   PM.add(createScopedNoAliasAAWrapperPass());
 }
 
-void PassManagerBuilder::addInstructionCombiningPass(
-    legacy::PassManagerBase &PM) const {
-  bool ExpensiveCombines = OptLevel > 2;
-  PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass(ExpensiveCombines));
-}
-
 void PassManagerBuilder::populateFunctionPassManager(
     legacy::FunctionPassManager &FPM) {
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_EarlyAsPossible, FPM);
@@ -374,7 +368,7 @@
   // Combine silly seq's
   if (OptLevel > 2)
     MPM.add(createAggressiveInstCombinerPass());
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+  MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   if (SizeLevel == 0 && !DisableLibCallsShrinkWrap)
     MPM.add(createLibCallsShrinkWrapPass());
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
@@ -409,7 +403,7 @@
   // simplify-cfg. Eventually loop-simplifycfg should be enhanced to replace the
   // need for this.
   MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+  MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   // We resume loop passes creating a second loop pipeline here.
   MPM.add(createIndVarSimplifyPass());        // Canonicalize indvars
   MPM.add(createLoopIdiomPass());             // Recognize idioms like memset.
@@ -440,7 +434,7 @@
 
   // Run instcombine after redundancy elimination to exploit opportunities
   // opened up by them.
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+  MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
   if (OptLevel > 1) {
     MPM.add(createJumpThreadingPass());         // Thread jumps
@@ -458,7 +452,7 @@
   MPM.add(createAggressiveDCEPass());         // Delete dead instructions
   MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); // Merge & remove BBs
   // Clean up after everything.
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+  MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
 
   if (EnableCHR && OptLevel >= 3 &&
@@ -569,7 +563,7 @@
 
   MPM.add(createDeadArgEliminationPass()); // Dead argument elimination
 
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM); // Clean up after IPCP & DAE
+  MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass()); // Clean up after IPCP & DAE
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
   MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); // Clean up after IPCP & DAE
 
@@ -741,7 +735,7 @@
   // on -O1 and no #pragma is found). Would be good to have these two passes
   // as function calls, so that we can only pass them when the vectorizer
   // changed the code.
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+  MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   if (OptLevel > 1 && ExtraVectorizerPasses) {
     // At higher optimization levels, try to clean up any runtime overlap and
     // alignment checks inserted by the vectorizer. We want to track correllated
@@ -750,11 +744,11 @@
     // and unswitch the runtime checks if possible. Once hoisted, we may have
     // dead (or speculatable) control flows or more combining opportunities.
     MPM.add(createCorrelatedValuePropagationPass());
-    addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+    MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
     MPM.add(createLICMPass(LicmMssaOptCap, LicmMssaNoAccForPromotionCap));
     MPM.add(createLoopUnswitchPass(SizeLevel || OptLevel < 3, DivergentTarget));
     MPM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
-    addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+    MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   }
 
   // Cleanup after loop vectorization, etc. Simplification passes like CVP and
@@ -772,7 +766,7 @@
   }
 
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, MPM);
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+  MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
 
   if (EnableUnrollAndJam && !DisableUnrollLoops) {
     // Unroll and Jam. We do this before unroll but need to be in a separate
@@ -787,7 +781,7 @@
 
   if (!DisableUnrollLoops) {
     // LoopUnroll may generate some redundency to cleanup.
-    addInstructionCombiningPass(MPM);
+    MPM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
 
     // Runtime unrolling will introduce runtime check in loop prologue. If the
     // unrolled loop is a inner loop, then the prologue will be inside the
@@ -925,7 +919,7 @@
   // calls, etc, so let instcombine do this.
   if (OptLevel > 2)
     PM.add(createAggressiveInstCombinerPass());
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(PM);
+  PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, PM);
 
   // Inline small functions
@@ -958,7 +952,7 @@
   PM.add(createArgumentPromotionPass());
 
   // The IPO passes may leave cruft around.  Clean up after them.
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(PM);
+  PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, PM);
   PM.add(createJumpThreadingPass());
 
@@ -1004,10 +998,10 @@
   // we may have exposed more scalar opportunities. Run parts of the scalar
   // optimizer again at this point.
   PM.add(createVectorCombinePass());
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(PM); // Initial cleanup
+  PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass()); // Initial cleanup
   PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass()); // if-convert
   PM.add(createSCCPPass()); // Propagate exposed constants
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(PM); // Clean up again
+  PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass()); // Clean up again
   PM.add(createBitTrackingDCEPass());
 
   // More scalar chains could be vectorized due to more alias information
@@ -1021,7 +1015,7 @@
   PM.add(createAlignmentFromAssumptionsPass());
 
   // Cleanup and simplify the code after the scalar optimizations.
-  addInstructionCombiningPass(PM);
+  PM.add(createInstructionCombiningPass());
   addExtensionsToPM(EP_Peephole, PM);
 
   PM.add(createJumpThreadingPass());
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h
@@ -313,9 +313,6 @@
   // Mode in which we are running the combiner.
   const bool MinimizeSize;
 
-  /// Enable combines that trigger rarely but are costly in compiletime.
-  const bool ExpensiveCombines;
-
   AliasAnalysis *AA;
 
   // Required analyses.
@@ -336,12 +333,12 @@
 
 public:
   InstCombiner(InstCombineWorklist &Worklist, BuilderTy &Builder,
-               bool MinimizeSize, bool ExpensiveCombines, AliasAnalysis *AA,
+               bool MinimizeSize, AliasAnalysis *AA,
                AssumptionCache &AC, TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, DominatorTree &DT,
                OptimizationRemarkEmitter &ORE, BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI,
                ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI, const DataLayout &DL, LoopInfo *LI)
       : Worklist(Worklist), Builder(Builder), MinimizeSize(MinimizeSize),
-        ExpensiveCombines(ExpensiveCombines), AA(AA), AC(AC), TLI(TLI), DT(DT),
+        AA(AA), AC(AC), TLI(TLI), DT(DT),
         DL(DL), SQ(DL, &TLI, &DT, &AC), ORE(ORE), BFI(BFI), PSI(PSI), LI(LI) {}
 
   /// Run the combiner over the entire worklist until it is empty.
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
@@ -130,11 +130,6 @@
 EnableCodeSinking("instcombine-code-sinking", cl::desc("Enable code sinking"),
                                               cl::init(true));
 
-// FIXME: This option is no longer used for anything and may be removed.
-static cl::opt<bool>
-EnableExpensiveCombines("expensive-combines",
-                        cl::desc("Enable expensive instruction combines"));
-
 static cl::opt<unsigned> LimitMaxIterations(
     "instcombine-max-iterations",
     cl::desc("Limit the maximum number of instruction combining iterations"),
@@ -3743,11 +3738,8 @@
     Function &F, InstCombineWorklist &Worklist, AliasAnalysis *AA,
     AssumptionCache &AC, TargetLibraryInfo &TLI, DominatorTree &DT,
     OptimizationRemarkEmitter &ORE, BlockFrequencyInfo *BFI,
-    ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI, bool ExpensiveCombines, unsigned MaxIterations,
-    LoopInfo *LI) {
+    ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI, unsigned MaxIterations, LoopInfo *LI) {
   auto &DL = F.getParent()->getDataLayout();
-  if (EnableExpensiveCombines.getNumOccurrences())
-    ExpensiveCombines = EnableExpensiveCombines;
   MaxIterations = std::min(MaxIterations, LimitMaxIterations.getValue());
 
   /// Builder - This is an IRBuilder that automatically inserts new
@@ -3789,7 +3781,7 @@
 
     MadeIRChange |= prepareICWorklistFromFunction(F, DL, &TLI, Worklist);
 
-    InstCombiner IC(Worklist, Builder, F.hasMinSize(), ExpensiveCombines, AA,
+    InstCombiner IC(Worklist, Builder, F.hasMinSize(), AA,
                     AC, TLI, DT, ORE, BFI, PSI, DL, LI);
     IC.MaxArraySizeForCombine = MaxArraySize;
 
@@ -3802,11 +3794,10 @@
   return MadeIRChange;
 }
 
-InstCombinePass::InstCombinePass(bool ExpensiveCombines)
-    : ExpensiveCombines(ExpensiveCombines), MaxIterations(LimitMaxIterations) {}
+InstCombinePass::InstCombinePass() : MaxIterations(LimitMaxIterations) {}
 
-InstCombinePass::InstCombinePass(bool ExpensiveCombines, unsigned MaxIterations)
-    : ExpensiveCombines(ExpensiveCombines), MaxIterations(MaxIterations) {}
+InstCombinePass::InstCombinePass(unsigned MaxIterations)
+    : MaxIterations(MaxIterations) {}
 
 PreservedAnalyses InstCombinePass::run(Function &F,
                                        FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
@@ -3826,8 +3817,7 @@
       &AM.getResult<BlockFrequencyAnalysis>(F) : nullptr;
 
   if (!combineInstructionsOverFunction(F, Worklist, AA, AC, TLI, DT, ORE, BFI,
-                                       PSI, ExpensiveCombines, MaxIterations,
-                                       LI))
+                                       PSI, MaxIterations, LI))
     // No changes, all analyses are preserved.
     return PreservedAnalyses::all();
 
@@ -3877,22 +3867,18 @@
       nullptr;
 
   return combineInstructionsOverFunction(F, Worklist, AA, AC, TLI, DT, ORE, BFI,
-                                         PSI, ExpensiveCombines, MaxIterations,
-                                         LI);
+                                         PSI, MaxIterations, LI);
 }
 
 char InstructionCombiningPass::ID = 0;
 
-InstructionCombiningPass::InstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines)
-    : FunctionPass(ID), ExpensiveCombines(ExpensiveCombines),
-      MaxIterations(InstCombineDefaultMaxIterations) {
+InstructionCombiningPass::InstructionCombiningPass()
+    : FunctionPass(ID), MaxIterations(InstCombineDefaultMaxIterations) {
   initializeInstructionCombiningPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
 }
 
-InstructionCombiningPass::InstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines,
-                                                   unsigned MaxIterations)
-    : FunctionPass(ID), ExpensiveCombines(ExpensiveCombines),
-      MaxIterations(MaxIterations) {
+InstructionCombiningPass::InstructionCombiningPass(unsigned MaxIterations)
+    : FunctionPass(ID), MaxIterations(MaxIterations) {
   initializeInstructionCombiningPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
 }
 
@@ -3918,13 +3904,12 @@
   initializeInstructionCombiningPassPass(*unwrap(R));
 }
 
-FunctionPass *llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines) {
-  return new InstructionCombiningPass(ExpensiveCombines);
+FunctionPass *llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass() {
+  return new InstructionCombiningPass();
 }
 
-FunctionPass *llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass(bool ExpensiveCombines,
-                                                   unsigned MaxIterations) {
-  return new InstructionCombiningPass(ExpensiveCombines, MaxIterations);
+FunctionPass *llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass(unsigned MaxIterations) {
+  return new InstructionCombiningPass(MaxIterations);
 }
 
 void LLVMAddInstructionCombiningPass(LLVMPassManagerRef PM) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/all-bits-shift.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/all-bits-shift.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/all-bits-shift.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/all-bits-shift.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-OFF
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=1 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-ON
+; RUN: opt -S -instcombine < %s | FileCheck %s
 target datalayout = "E-m:e-i64:64-n32:64"
 target triple = "powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu"
 
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/assume.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/assume.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/assume.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/assume.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-ON
-; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-OFF
+; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
 target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
 
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/call-returned.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/call-returned.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/call-returned.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/call-returned.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-OFF
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=1 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-ON
+; RUN: opt -S -instcombine < %s | FileCheck %s
 
 declare i32 @passthru_i32(i32 returned)
 declare i8* @passthru_p8(i8* returned)
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/expensive-combines.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/expensive-combines.ll
deleted file mode 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/expensive-combines.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEFAULT
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=1 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXPENSIVE-ON
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXPENSIVE-OFF
-
-define void @test() {
-; DEFAULT-LABEL: @test(
-; DEFAULT-NEXT:    [[CALL:%.*]] = call i32 @passthru(i32 0)
-; DEFAULT-NEXT:    call void @sink(i32 0)
-; DEFAULT-NEXT:    ret void
-;
-; EXPENSIVE-ON-LABEL: @test(
-; EXPENSIVE-ON-NEXT:    [[CALL:%.*]] = call i32 @passthru(i32 0)
-; EXPENSIVE-ON-NEXT:    call void @sink(i32 0)
-; EXPENSIVE-ON-NEXT:    ret void
-;
-; EXPENSIVE-OFF-LABEL: @test(
-; EXPENSIVE-OFF-NEXT:    [[CALL:%.*]] = call i32 @passthru(i32 0)
-; EXPENSIVE-OFF-NEXT:    call void @sink(i32 0)
-; EXPENSIVE-OFF-NEXT:    ret void
-;
-  %call = call i32 @passthru(i32 0)
-  call void @sink(i32 %call)
-  ret void
-}
-
-declare i32 @passthru(i32 returned)
-declare void @sink(i32)
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-bits.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-bits.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-bits.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-bits.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-OFF
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=1 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-ON
+; RUN: opt -S -instcombine < %s | FileCheck %s
 
 define void @test_shl(i1 %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test_shl(
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-signbit-shift.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-signbit-shift.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-signbit-shift.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/known-signbit-shift.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-OFF
-; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -expensive-combines=1 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-ON
+; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -S | FileCheck %s
 
 ; Result of left shifting a non-negative integer
 ; with nsw flag should also be non-negative
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/out-of-bounds-indexes.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/out-of-bounds-indexes.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/out-of-bounds-indexes.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/out-of-bounds-indexes.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-OFF
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=1 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-ON
+; RUN: opt -S -instcombine < %s | FileCheck %s
 ; Check that we don't crash on unreasonable constant indexes
 
 define i32 @test_out_of_bounds(i32 %a, i1 %x, i1 %y) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/phi-shifts.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/phi-shifts.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/phi-shifts.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/phi-shifts.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-OFF
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=1 < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,EXPENSIVE-ON
+; RUN: opt -S -instcombine < %s | FileCheck %s
 
 ; OSS Fuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15217
 define i64 @fuzz15217(i1 %cond, i8* %Ptr, i64 %Val) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/pr44541.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/pr44541.ll
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/pr44541.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/pr44541.ll
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
-; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 -instcombine-infinite-loop-threshold=2 < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt -S -instcombine -instcombine-infinite-loop-threshold=2 < %s | FileCheck %s
 
 ; This test used to cause an infinite combine loop.