Index: lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -1737,6 +1737,38 @@
   };
 }
 
+
+// We're trying to construct a SCEV of type `Type' with `Ops' as operands and
+// `OldFlags' as can't-wrap behavior.  Infer a more aggressive set of
+// can't-overflow flags for the operation if possible.
+static SCEV::NoWrapFlags
+StrengthenNoWrapFlags(ScalarEvolution &SE, SCEVTypes Type,
+                      const SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Ops,
+                      SCEV::NoWrapFlags OldFlags) {
+  bool CanAnalyze = (Type == scAddExpr) || (Type == scAddRecExpr) ||
+    (Type == scMulExpr);
+  (void) CanAnalyze;
+  assert(CanAnalyze && "don't call from other places!");
+
+  // If FlagNSW is true and all the operands are non-negative, infer FlagNUW.
+  int SignOrUnsignMask = SCEV::FlagNUW | SCEV::FlagNSW;
+  SCEV::NoWrapFlags SignOrUnsignWrap =
+    ScalarEvolution::maskFlags(OldFlags, SignOrUnsignMask);
+  if ((SignOrUnsignWrap == SCEV::FlagNSW) &&
+      (SignOrUnsignWrap != SignOrUnsignMask)) {
+
+    if (std::all_of(Ops.begin(), Ops.end(), [&SE](const SCEV *S) {
+          return SE.isKnownNonNegative(S);
+        })) {
+      return ScalarEvolution::setFlags(
+        OldFlags, (SCEV::NoWrapFlags)SignOrUnsignMask);
+    }
+  }
+
+  return OldFlags;
+}
+
+
 /// getAddExpr - Get a canonical add expression, or something simpler if
 /// possible.
 const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::getAddExpr(SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Ops,
@@ -1752,20 +1784,7 @@
            "SCEVAddExpr operand types don't match!");
 #endif
 
-  // If FlagNSW is true and all the operands are non-negative, infer FlagNUW.
-  // And vice-versa.
-  int SignOrUnsignMask = SCEV::FlagNUW | SCEV::FlagNSW;
-  SCEV::NoWrapFlags SignOrUnsignWrap = maskFlags(Flags, SignOrUnsignMask);
-  if (SignOrUnsignWrap && (SignOrUnsignWrap != SignOrUnsignMask)) {
-    bool All = true;
-    for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = Ops.begin(),
-         E = Ops.end(); I != E; ++I)
-      if (!isKnownNonNegative(*I)) {
-        All = false;
-        break;
-      }
-    if (All) Flags = setFlags(Flags, (SCEV::NoWrapFlags)SignOrUnsignMask);
-  }
+  Flags = StrengthenNoWrapFlags(*this, scAddExpr, Ops, Flags);
 
   // Sort by complexity, this groups all similar expression types together.
   GroupByComplexity(Ops, LI);
@@ -2174,20 +2193,7 @@
            "SCEVMulExpr operand types don't match!");
 #endif
 
-  // If FlagNSW is true and all the operands are non-negative, infer FlagNUW.
-  // And vice-versa.
-  int SignOrUnsignMask = SCEV::FlagNUW | SCEV::FlagNSW;
-  SCEV::NoWrapFlags SignOrUnsignWrap = maskFlags(Flags, SignOrUnsignMask);
-  if (SignOrUnsignWrap && (SignOrUnsignWrap != SignOrUnsignMask)) {
-    bool All = true;
-    for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = Ops.begin(),
-         E = Ops.end(); I != E; ++I)
-      if (!isKnownNonNegative(*I)) {
-        All = false;
-        break;
-      }
-    if (All) Flags = setFlags(Flags, (SCEV::NoWrapFlags)SignOrUnsignMask);
-  }
+  Flags = StrengthenNoWrapFlags(*this, scMulExpr, Ops, Flags);
 
   // Sort by complexity, this groups all similar expression types together.
   GroupByComplexity(Ops, LI);
@@ -2653,20 +2659,7 @@
   // meaningful BE count at this point (and if we don't, we'd be stuck
   // with a SCEVCouldNotCompute as the cached BE count).
 
-  // If FlagNSW is true and all the operands are non-negative, infer FlagNUW.
-  // And vice-versa.
-  int SignOrUnsignMask = SCEV::FlagNUW | SCEV::FlagNSW;
-  SCEV::NoWrapFlags SignOrUnsignWrap = maskFlags(Flags, SignOrUnsignMask);
-  if (SignOrUnsignWrap && (SignOrUnsignWrap != SignOrUnsignMask)) {
-    bool All = true;
-    for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = Operands.begin(),
-         E = Operands.end(); I != E; ++I)
-      if (!isKnownNonNegative(*I)) {
-        All = false;
-        break;
-      }
-    if (All) Flags = setFlags(Flags, (SCEV::NoWrapFlags)SignOrUnsignMask);
-  }
+  Flags = StrengthenNoWrapFlags(*this, scAddRecExpr, Operands, Flags);
 
   // Canonicalize nested AddRecs in by nesting them in order of loop depth.
   if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *NestedAR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Operands[0])) {
Index: test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr22179.ll
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/pr22179.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+; RUN: opt -analyze -scalar-evolution < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+%struct.anon = type { i8 }
+%struct.S = type { i32 }
+
+@a = common global %struct.anon zeroinitializer, align 1
+@b = common global %struct.S zeroinitializer, align 4
+
+; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable
+define i32 @main() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @main
+  store i8 0, i8* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.anon* @a, i64 0, i32 0), align 1
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %storemerge1 = phi i8 [ 0, %0 ], [ %inc, %loop ]
+  %m = load volatile i32* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.S* @b, i64 0, i32 0), align 4
+  %inc = add nuw i8 %storemerge1, 1
+; CHECK:   %inc = add nuw i8 %storemerge1, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: -->  {1,+,1}<nuw><%loop>
+; CHECK-NOT: -->  {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop>
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i8 %inc, -128
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  store i8 -128, i8* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.anon* @a, i64 0, i32 0), align 1
+  ret i32 0
+}
Index: test/CodeGen/X86/avoid_complex_am.ll
===================================================================
--- test/CodeGen/X86/avoid_complex_am.ll
+++ test/CodeGen/X86/avoid_complex_am.ll
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
   %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double* %b, i64 %tmp
   %tmp1 = load double* %arrayidx, align 8
 ; The induction variable should carry the scaling factor: 1.
-; CHECK: [[IVNEXT]] = add nuw nsw i64 [[IV]], 1
+; CHECK: [[IVNEXT]] = add nuw i64 [[IV]], 1
   %indvars.iv.next = add i64 %indvars.iv, 1
   %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds double* %c, i64 %indvars.iv.next
   %tmp2 = load double* %arrayidx2, align 8