Index: lib/IR/Verifier.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/IR/Verifier.cpp +++ lib/IR/Verifier.cpp @@ -2691,10 +2691,12 @@ case Intrinsic::experimental_gc_result_ptr: { // Are we tied to a statepoint properly? CallSite StatepointCS(CI.getArgOperand(0)); - const Function *StatepointFn = StatepointCS.getCalledFunction(); + const Function *StatepointFn = + StatepointCS.getInstruction() ? StatepointCS.getCalledFunction() : nullptr; Assert2(StatepointFn && StatepointFn->isDeclaration() && StatepointFn->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::experimental_gc_statepoint, - "token must be from a statepoint", &CI, CI.getArgOperand(0)); + "gc.result operand #1 must be from a statepoint", + &CI, CI.getArgOperand(0)); // Assert that result type matches wrapped callee. const Value *Target = StatepointCS.getArgument(0); @@ -2710,32 +2712,53 @@ // Are we tied to a statepoint properly? CallSite StatepointCS(CI.getArgOperand(0)); const Function *StatepointFn = - StatepointCS.getInstruction() ? StatepointCS.getCalledFunction() : NULL; + StatepointCS.getInstruction() ? StatepointCS.getCalledFunction() : nullptr; Assert2(StatepointFn && StatepointFn->isDeclaration() && StatepointFn->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::experimental_gc_statepoint, - "token must be from a statepoint", &CI, CI.getArgOperand(0)); + "gc.relocate operand #1 must be from a statepoint", + &CI, CI.getArgOperand(0)); // Both the base and derived must be piped through the safepoint Value* Base = CI.getArgOperand(1); - Assert1( isa(Base), "must be integer offset", &CI); + Assert1(isa(Base), + "gc.relocate operand #2 must be integer offset", &CI); Value* Derived = CI.getArgOperand(2); - Assert1( isa(Derived), "must be integer offset", &CI); + Assert1(isa(Derived), + "gc.relocate operand #3 must be integer offset", &CI); const int BaseIndex = cast(Base)->getZExtValue(); const int DerivedIndex = cast(Derived)->getZExtValue(); // Check the bounds Assert1(0 <= BaseIndex && BaseIndex < (int)StatepointCS.arg_size(), - "index out of bounds", &CI); + "gc.relocate: statepoint base index out of bounds", &CI); Assert1(0 <= DerivedIndex && DerivedIndex < (int)StatepointCS.arg_size(), - "index out of bounds", &CI); + "gc.relocate: statepoint derived index out of bounds", &CI); + + // Check that BaseIndex and DerivedIndex fall within the 'gc parameters' + // section of the statepoint's argument + const int NumCallArgs = + cast(StatepointCS.getArgument(1))->getZExtValue(); + const int NumDeoptArgs = + cast(StatepointCS.getArgument(NumCallArgs + 3))->getZExtValue(); + const int GCParamArgsStart = NumCallArgs + NumDeoptArgs + 4; + const int GCParamArgsEnd = StatepointCS.arg_size(); + Assert1(GCParamArgsStart <= BaseIndex && + BaseIndex < GCParamArgsEnd, + "gc.relocate: statepoint base index doesn't fall within the " + "'gc parameters' section of the statepoint call", &CI); + Assert1(GCParamArgsStart <= DerivedIndex && + DerivedIndex < GCParamArgsEnd, + "gc.relocate: statepoint derived index doesn't fall within the " + "'gc parameters' section of the statepoint call", &CI); + // Assert that the result type matches the type of the relocated pointer GCRelocateOperands Operands(&CI); Assert1(Operands.derivedPtr()->getType() == CI.getType(), - "gc.relocate: relocating a pointer shouldn't change it's type", + "gc.relocate: relocating a pointer shouldn't change its type", &CI); break; } Index: test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-call-lowering.ll =================================================================== --- test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-call-lowering.ll +++ test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-call-lowering.ll @@ -60,6 +60,21 @@ ret float %call1 } +define i1 @test_relocate(i32* %a) { +; CHECK-LABEL: test_relocate +; Check that an ununsed relocate has no code-generation impact +; CHECK: pushq %rax +; CHECK: callq return_i1 +; CHECK-NEXT: .Ltmp13: +; CHECK-NEXT: popq %rdx +; CHECK-NEXT: retq +entry: + %safepoint_token = tail call i32 (i1 ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_i1f(i1 ()* @return_i1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32* %a) + %call1 = call i32* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p0i32(i32 %safepoint_token, i32 4, i32 4) + %call2 = call zeroext i1 @llvm.experimental.gc.result.int.i1(i32 %safepoint_token) + ret i1 %call2 +} + declare i32 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_i1f(i1 ()*, i32, i32, ...) declare i1 @llvm.experimental.gc.result.int.i1(i32) @@ -72,3 +87,4 @@ declare i32 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_f32f(float ()*, i32, i32, ...) declare float @llvm.experimental.gc.result.float.f32(i32) +declare i32* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p0i32(i32, i32, i32) Index: test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-stackmap-format.ll =================================================================== --- test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-stackmap-format.ll +++ test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-stackmap-format.ll @@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ store i32 addrspace(1)* null, i32 addrspace(1)** %metadata1 ; NOTE: Currently NOT testing alloca lowering in the StackMap format. Its ; known to be broken. - %safepoint_token = tail call i32 (i1 ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_i1f(i1 ()* @return_i1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 2, i32 addrspace(1)* %ptr, i32 addrspace(1)* null) + %safepoint_token = tail call i32 (i1 ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_i1f(i1 ()* @return_i1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 2, i32 addrspace(1)* %ptr, i32 addrspace(1)* null, i32 addrspace(1)* %ptr, i32 addrspace(1)* null) %call1 = call zeroext i1 @llvm.experimental.gc.result.int.i1(i32 %safepoint_token) - %a = call i32 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i32(i32 %safepoint_token, i32 4, i32 4) - %b = call i32 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i32(i32 %safepoint_token, i32 5, i32 5) + %a = call i32 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i32(i32 %safepoint_token, i32 6, i32 6) + %b = call i32 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i32(i32 %safepoint_token, i32 7, i32 7) ; ret i1 %call1 }