Index: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -19537,6 +19537,37 @@
     }
   }
 
+  // Make sure all but the first op are undef.
+  auto ConcatWithUndef = [](SDValue Concat) {
+    return Concat.getOpcode() == ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS &&
+           std::all_of(std::next(Concat->op_begin()), Concat->op_end(),
+                       [](const SDValue &Op) {
+                         return Op.isUndef();
+                       });
+  };
+
+  // The following pattern is likely to emerge with vector reduction ops. Moving
+  // the binary operation ahead of the concat may allow using a narrower vector
+  // instruction that has better performance than the wide version of the op:
+  // VBinOp (concat X, undef), (concat Y, undef) --> concat (VBinOp X, Y), VecC
+  if (ConcatWithUndef(LHS) && ConcatWithUndef(RHS) &&
+      (LHS.hasOneUse() || RHS.hasOneUse())) {
+    SDValue X = LHS.getOperand(0);
+    SDValue Y = RHS.getOperand(0);
+    EVT NarrowVT = X.getValueType();
+    if (NarrowVT == Y.getValueType() &&
+        TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustomOrPromote(Opcode, NarrowVT)) {
+      // (binop undef, undef) may not return undef, so compute that result.
+      SDLoc DL(N);
+      SDValue VecC =
+          DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, NarrowVT, DAG.getUNDEF(NarrowVT),
+                      DAG.getUNDEF(NarrowVT));
+      SmallVector<SDValue, 4> Ops(LHS.getNumOperands(), VecC);
+      Ops[0] = DAG.getNode(Opcode, DL, NarrowVT, X, Y);
+      return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, VT, Ops);
+    }
+  }
+
   if (SDValue V = scalarizeBinOpOfSplats(N, DAG))
     return V;
 
Index: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -15013,7 +15013,7 @@
 static SDValue getShuffleHalfVectors(const SDLoc &DL, SDValue V1, SDValue V2,
                                      ArrayRef<int> HalfMask, int HalfIdx1,
                                      int HalfIdx2, bool UndefLower,
-                                     SelectionDAG &DAG) {
+                                     SelectionDAG &DAG, bool UseConcat = false) {
   assert(V1.getValueType() == V2.getValueType() && "Different sized vectors?");
   assert(V1.getValueType().isSimple() && "Expecting only simple types");
 
@@ -15034,6 +15034,14 @@
   SDValue Half1 = getHalfVector(HalfIdx1);
   SDValue Half2 = getHalfVector(HalfIdx2);
   SDValue V = DAG.getVectorShuffle(HalfVT, DL, Half1, Half2, HalfMask);
+  if (UseConcat) {
+    SDValue Op0 = V;
+    SDValue Op1 = DAG.getUNDEF(HalfVT);
+    if (UndefLower)
+      std::swap(Op0, Op1);
+    return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, VT, Op0, Op1);
+  }
+
   unsigned Offset = UndefLower ? HalfNumElts : 0;
   return DAG.getNode(ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, DL, VT, DAG.getUNDEF(VT), V,
                      DAG.getIntPtrConstant(Offset, DL));
@@ -33974,7 +33982,7 @@
   // the wide shuffle that we started with.
   return getShuffleHalfVectors(SDLoc(Shuf), Shuf->getOperand(0),
                                Shuf->getOperand(1), HalfMask, HalfIdx1,
-                               HalfIdx2, false, DAG);
+                               HalfIdx2, false, DAG, /*UseConcat*/true);
 }
 
 static SDValue combineShuffle(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,