Index: lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/Utils/LowerSwitch.cpp
@@ -584,6 +584,11 @@
         PopSucc->removePredecessor(OrigBlock);
       return;
     }
+
+    // If the condition was a PHI node with the switch block as a predecessor
+    // removing predecessors may have caused the condition to be erased.
+    // Getting the condition value again here protects against that.
+    Val = SI->getCondition();
   }
 
   // Create a new, empty default block so that the new hierarchy of
Index: test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/condition-phi-unreachable-default.ll
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/condition-phi-unreachable-default.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s -lowerswitch -S | FileCheck %s
+
+; This test verifies -lowerswitch does not crash when an removing an
+; unreachable default branch causes a PHI node used as the switch
+; condition to be erased.
+
+define void @f() local_unnamed_addr {
+entry:
+  br label %sw.epilog
+
+sw.epilog:                                        ; preds = %sw.epilog.outer, %for.body
+  %i = phi i32 [ undef, %for.body ], [ 0, %entry ]
+  br i1 undef, label %for.body, label %for.end
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %sw.epilog
+  switch i32 %i, label %sw.epilog [
+    i32 0, label %sw.epilog.outer.backedge.loopexit
+    i32 1, label %sw.epilog.outer.backedge
+  ]
+
+sw.epilog.outer.backedge.loopexit:                ; preds = %for.body
+  br label %for.end
+
+sw.epilog.outer.backedge:                         ; preds = %for.body
+  unreachable
+
+for.end:                                          ; preds = %sw.epilog
+  ret void
+}
+
+; The phi and the switch should both be eliminated.
+; CHECK: @f()
+; CHECK: sw.epilog:
+; CHECK-NOT: phi
+; CHECK: for.body:
+; CHECK-NOT: switch