Index: lib/Driver/ToolChains/MSVC.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Driver/ToolChains/MSVC.cpp
+++ lib/Driver/ToolChains/MSVC.cpp
@@ -1407,10 +1407,10 @@
           DAL.AddFlagArg(
               A, Opts.getOption(options::OPT_fno_omit_frame_pointer));
       } else {
-        // Don't warn about /Oy- in 64-bit builds (where
+        // Don't warn about /Oy- in x86-64 builds (where
         // SupportsForcingFramePointer is false).  The flag having no effect
         // there is a compiler-internal optimization, and people shouldn't have
-        // to special-case their build files for 64-bit clang-cl.
+        // to special-case their build files for x86-64 clang-cl.
         A->claim();
       }
       break;
@@ -1441,8 +1441,8 @@
   DerivedArgList *DAL = new DerivedArgList(Args.getBaseArgs());
   const OptTable &Opts = getDriver().getOpts();
 
-  // /Oy and /Oy- only has an effect under X86-32.
-  bool SupportsForcingFramePointer = getArch() == llvm::Triple::x86;
+  // /Oy and /Oy- don't have an effect on X86-64
+  bool SupportsForcingFramePointer = getArch() != llvm::Triple::x86_64;
 
   // The -O[12xd] flag actually expands to several flags.  We must desugar the
   // flags so that options embedded can be negated.  For example, the '-O2' flag
Index: test/Driver/cl-options.c
===================================================================
--- test/Driver/cl-options.c
+++ test/Driver/cl-options.c
@@ -178,6 +178,10 @@
 // Oy_2: -momit-leaf-frame-pointer
 // Oy_2: -O2
 
+// RUN: %clang_cl --target=aarch64-pc-windows-msvc -Werror /Oy- /O2 -### -- %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=Oy_aarch64 %s
+// Oy_aarch64: -mdisable-fp-elim
+// Oy_aarch64: -O2
+
 // RUN: %clang_cl --target=i686-pc-win32 -Werror /O2 /O2 -### -- %s 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=O2O2 %s
 // O2O2: "-O2"