Index: lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopSimplifyCFG.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopSimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopSimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
       if (!LiveLoopBlocks.count(From))
         return false;
       BasicBlock *TheOnlySucc = getOnlyLiveSuccessor(From);
-      return !TheOnlySucc || TheOnlySucc == To;
+      return !TheOnlySucc || TheOnlySucc == To || LI.getLoopFor(From) != &L;
     };
 
     // The loop will not be destroyed if its latch is live.
Index: test/Transforms/LoopSimplifyCFG/live_block_marking.ll
===================================================================
--- test/Transforms/LoopSimplifyCFG/live_block_marking.ll
+++ test/Transforms/LoopSimplifyCFG/live_block_marking.ll
@@ -4,11 +4,13 @@
 ; RUN: opt -S -enable-loop-simplifycfg-term-folding=true -passes='require<domtree>,loop(indvars,simplify-cfg)' -debug-only=loop-simplifycfg -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-lcssa 2>&1 < %s | FileCheck %s
 ; RUN: opt -S -enable-loop-simplifycfg-term-folding=true -indvars -loop-simplifycfg -enable-mssa-loop-dependency=true -verify-memoryssa -debug-only=loop-simplifycfg -verify-loop-info -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-lcssa 2>&1 < %s | FileCheck %s
 
-; This test demonstrates a bug in live blocks markup that is only catchable in
-; inter-pass interaction.
 define void @test(i1 %c) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    switch i32 0, label [[ENTRY_SPLIT:%.*]] [
+; CHECK-NEXT:    i32 1, label [[DEAD_EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ]
+; CHECK:       entry-split:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[OUTER:%.*]]
 ; CHECK:       outer:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[C:%.*]], label [[TO_FOLD:%.*]], label [[LATCH:%.*]]
@@ -25,7 +27,7 @@
 ; CHECK:       latch.loopexit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[LATCH]]
 ; CHECK:       latch:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 true, label [[OUTER]], label [[DEAD_EXIT:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label [[OUTER]]
 ; CHECK:       dead_exit:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
 ;