Index: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td =================================================================== --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td @@ -759,6 +759,10 @@ Warning<"ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible layouts for classes " "with base classes or virtual functions">, DefaultError, InGroup; +def warn_npot_ms_struct : + Warning<"ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible layouts with fundamental " + "data types with sizes that aren't a power of two">, + DefaultError, InGroup; def err_section_conflict : Error<"%0 causes a section type conflict with %1">; def err_no_base_classes : Error<"invalid use of '__super', %0 has no base classes">; def err_invalid_super_scope : Error<"invalid use of '__super', " Index: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp =================================================================== --- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp +++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp @@ -1752,10 +1752,32 @@ QualType T = Context.getBaseElementType(D->getType()); if (const BuiltinType *BTy = T->getAs()) { CharUnits TypeSize = Context.getTypeSizeInChars(BTy); - assert( - (llvm::isPowerOf2_64(TypeSize.getQuantity()) || - Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isWindowsGNUEnvironment()) && - "Non PowerOf2 size outside of GNU mode"); + + if (!llvm::isPowerOf2_64(TypeSize.getQuantity())) { + assert( + !Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isWindowsMSVCEnvironment() && + "Non PowerOf2 size in MSVC mode"); + // Base types with sizes that aren't a power of two don't work + // with the layout rules for MS structs. This isn't an issue in + // MSVC itself since there are no such base data types there. + // On e.g. x86_32 mingw and linux, long double is 12 bytes though. + // Any structs involving that data type obviously can't be ABI + // compatible with MSVC regardless of how it is laid out. + + // Since ms_struct can be mass enabled (via a pragma or via the + // -mms-bitfields command line parameter), this can trigger for + // structs that don't actually need MSVC compatibility, so we + // need to be able to sidestep the ms_struct layout for these types. + + // Since the combination of -mms-bitfields together with structs + // like max_align_t (which contains a long double) for mingw is + // quite comon (and GCC handles it silently), just handle it + // silently there. For other targets that have ms_struct enabled + // (most probably via a pragma or attribute), trigger a diagnostic + // that defaults to an error. + if (!Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isWindowsGNUEnvironment()) + Diag(D->getLocation(), diag::warn_npot_ms_struct); + } if (TypeSize > FieldAlign && llvm::isPowerOf2_64(TypeSize.getQuantity())) FieldAlign = TypeSize; Index: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms_struct-long-double.c =================================================================== --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms_struct-long-double.c +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms_struct-long-double.c @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -triple i686-windows-gnu -fdump-record-layouts %s | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -triple i686-linux -fdump-record-layouts -Wno-incompatible-ms-struct %s | FileCheck %s +// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm-only -triple i686-linux -fdump-record-layouts %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=ERROR + +struct ldb_struct { + char c; + long double ldb; +} __attribute__((__ms_struct__)); + +struct ldb_struct a; + +// CHECK: 0 | struct ldb_struct +// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | char c +// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | long double ldb +// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=16, align=4] + +// ERROR: error: ms_struct may not produce Microsoft-compatible layouts with fundamental data types with sizes that aren't a power of two