Index: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/InlineSpiller.cpp =================================================================== --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/InlineSpiller.cpp +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/InlineSpiller.cpp @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ void eliminateRedundantSpills(LiveInterval &LI, VNInfo *VNI); void markValueUsed(LiveInterval*, VNInfo*); + bool canGuaranteeAssignmentAfterRemat(unsigned VReg, MachineInstr &MI); bool reMaterializeFor(LiveInterval &, MachineInstr &MI); void reMaterializeAll(); @@ -514,6 +515,26 @@ } while (!WorkList.empty()); } +bool InlineSpiller::canGuaranteeAssignmentAfterRemat(unsigned VReg, + MachineInstr &MI) { + // Here's a quick explanation of the problem we're trying to handle here: + // * There are some pseudo instructions with more vreg uses than there are + // physical registers on the machine. + // * This is normally handled by spilling the vreg, and folding the reload + // into the user instruction. (Thus decreasing the number of used vregs + // until the remainder can be assigned to physregs.) + // * However, since we may try to spill vregs in any order, we can end up + // trying to spill each operand to the instruction, and then rematting it + // instead. When that happens, the new live intervals (for the remats) are + // expected to be trivially assignable (i.e. RS_Done). However, since we + // may have more remats than physregs, we're guaranteed to fail to assign + // one. + // At the moment, we only handle this for STATEPOINTs since they're the only + // psuedo op where we've seen this. If we start seeing other instructions + // with the same problem, we need to revisit this. + return (MI.getOpcode() != TargetOpcode::STATEPOINT); +} + /// reMaterializeFor - Attempt to rematerialize before MI instead of reloading. bool InlineSpiller::reMaterializeFor(LiveInterval &VirtReg, MachineInstr &MI) { // Analyze instruction @@ -569,6 +590,11 @@ return true; } + // If we can't guarantee that we'll be able to actually assign the new vreg, + // we can't remat. + if (!canGuaranteeAssignmentAfterRemat(VirtReg.reg, MI)) + return false; + // Allocate a new register for the remat. unsigned NewVReg = Edit->createFrom(Original); Index: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-live-in.ll =================================================================== --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-live-in.ll +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/statepoint-live-in.ll @@ -128,6 +128,77 @@ ret void } +; A variant of test7 where values are not directly foldable from stack slots. +define void @test7(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c, i32 %d, i32 %e, i32 %f, i32 %g, i32 %h, i32 %i, i32 %j, i32 %k, i32 %l, i32 %m, i32 %n, i32 %o, i32 %p, i32 %q, i32 %r, i32 %s, i32 %t, i32 %u, i32 %v, i32 %w, i32 %x, i32 %y, i32 %z) gc "statepoint-example" { +; The code for this is terrible, check simply for correctness for the moment +; CHECK-LABEL: test7: +; CHECK: callq _bar +entry: + %a64 = zext i32 %a to i64 + %b64 = zext i32 %b to i64 + %c64 = zext i32 %c to i64 + %d64 = zext i32 %d to i64 + %e64 = zext i32 %e to i64 + %f64 = zext i32 %f to i64 + %g64 = zext i32 %g to i64 + %h64 = zext i32 %h to i64 + %i64 = zext i32 %i to i64 + %j64 = zext i32 %j to i64 + %k64 = zext i32 %k to i64 + %l64 = zext i32 %l to i64 + %m64 = zext i32 %m to i64 + %n64 = zext i32 %n to i64 + %o64 = zext i32 %o to i64 + %p64 = zext i32 %p to i64 + %q64 = zext i32 %q to i64 + %r64 = zext i32 %r to i64 + %s64 = zext i32 %s to i64 + %t64 = zext i32 %t to i64 + %u64 = zext i32 %u to i64 + %v64 = zext i32 %v to i64 + %w64 = zext i32 %w to i64 + %x64 = zext i32 %x to i64 + %y64 = zext i32 %y to i64 + %z64 = zext i32 %z to i64 + %statepoint_token1 = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @bar, i32 0, i32 2, i32 0, i32 26, i64 %a64, i64 %b64, i64 %c64, i64 %d64, i64 %e64, i64 %f64, i64 %g64, i64 %h64, i64 %i64, i64 %j64, i64 %k64, i64 %l64, i64 %m64, i64 %n64, i64 %o64, i64 %p64, i64 %q64, i64 %r64, i64 %s64, i64 %t64, i64 %u64, i64 %v64, i64 %w64, i64 %x64, i64 %y64, i64 %z64) + ret void +} + +; a variant of test7 with mixed types chosen to exercise register aliases +define void @test8(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c, i32 %d, i32 %e, i32 %f, i32 %g, i32 %h, i32 %i, i32 %j, i32 %k, i32 %l, i32 %m, i32 %n, i32 %o, i32 %p, i32 %q, i32 %r, i32 %s, i32 %t, i32 %u, i32 %v, i32 %w, i32 %x, i32 %y, i32 %z) gc "statepoint-example" { +; The code for this is terrible, check simply for correctness for the moment +; CHECK-LABEL: test8: +; CHECK: callq _bar +entry: + %a8 = trunc i32 %a to i8 + %b8 = trunc i32 %b to i8 + %c8 = trunc i32 %c to i8 + %d8 = trunc i32 %d to i8 + %e16 = trunc i32 %e to i16 + %f16 = trunc i32 %f to i16 + %g16 = trunc i32 %g to i16 + %h16 = trunc i32 %h to i16 + %i64 = zext i32 %i to i64 + %j64 = zext i32 %j to i64 + %k64 = zext i32 %k to i64 + %l64 = zext i32 %l to i64 + %m64 = zext i32 %m to i64 + %n64 = zext i32 %n to i64 + %o64 = zext i32 %o to i64 + %p64 = zext i32 %p to i64 + %q64 = zext i32 %q to i64 + %r64 = zext i32 %r to i64 + %s64 = zext i32 %s to i64 + %t64 = zext i32 %t to i64 + %u64 = zext i32 %u to i64 + %v64 = zext i32 %v to i64 + %w64 = zext i32 %w to i64 + %x64 = zext i32 %x to i64 + %y64 = zext i32 %y to i64 + %z64 = zext i32 %z to i64 + %statepoint_token1 = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @bar, i32 0, i32 2, i32 0, i32 26, i8 %a8, i8 %b8, i8 %c8, i8 %d8, i16 %e16, i16 %f16, i16 %g16, i16 %h16, i64 %i64, i64 %j64, i64 %k64, i64 %l64, i64 %m64, i64 %n64, i64 %o64, i64 %p64, i64 %q64, i64 %r64, i64 %s64, i64 %t64, i64 %u64, i64 %v64, i64 %w64, i64 %x64, i64 %y64, i64 %z64) + ret void +} ; CHECK: Ltmp0-_test1 ; CHECK: .byte 1