Index: compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_report.cc
===================================================================
--- compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_report.cc
+++ compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_report.cc
@@ -124,51 +124,48 @@
  public:
   explicit ScopedInErrorReport(bool fatal = false) {
     halt_on_error_ = fatal || flags()->halt_on_error;
-
-    if (lock_.TryLock()) {
-      StartReporting();
-      return;
-    }
-
-    // ASan found two bugs in different threads simultaneously.
-
     u32 current_tid = GetCurrentTidOrInvalid();
-    if (reporting_thread_tid_ == current_tid ||
-        reporting_thread_tid_ == kInvalidTid) {
-      // This is either asynch signal or nested error during error reporting.
-      // Fail simple to avoid deadlocks in Report().
-
-      // Can't use Report() here because of potential deadlocks
-      // in nested signal handlers.
-      static const char msg[] =
-          "AddressSanitizer: nested bug in the same thread, aborting.\n";
-      CatastrophicErrorWrite(msg, sizeof(msg) - 1);
-
-      internal__exit(common_flags()->exitcode);
-    }
 
-    if (halt_on_error_) {
-      // Do not print more than one report, otherwise they will mix up.
-      // Error reporting functions shouldn't return at this situation, as
-      // they are effectively no-returns.
+    for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
+      u32 expected_tid = kInvalidTid;
+      if (atomic_compare_exchange_strong(&reporting_thread_tid_, &expected_tid,
+                                         current_tid, memory_order_relaxed)) {
+        // We've claimed reporting_thread_tid_ so proceed.
+        StartReporting();
+        return;
+      }
+
+      if (expected_tid == current_tid) {
+        // This is either asynch signal or nested error during error reporting.
+        // Fail simple to avoid deadlocks in Report().
+
+        // Can't use Report() here because of potential deadlocks in nested
+        // signal handlers.
+        static const char msg[] =
+            "AddressSanitizer: nested bug in the same thread, aborting.\n";
+        CatastrophicErrorWrite(msg, sizeof(msg) - 1);
+
+        internal__exit(common_flags()->exitcode);
+      }
+
+      if (halt_on_error_) break;
+      SleepForMillis(100);
+    }
 
-      Report("AddressSanitizer: while reporting a bug found another one. "
-             "Ignoring.\n");
+    // Do not print more than one report, otherwise they will mix up.
+    // Error reporting functions shouldn't return at this situation, as
+    // they are effectively no-returns.
+    Report(
+        "AddressSanitizer: while reporting a bug found another one. "
+        "Ignoring.\n");
 
-      // Sleep long enough to make sure that the thread which started
-      // to print an error report will finish doing it.
-      SleepForSeconds(Max(100, flags()->sleep_before_dying + 1));
+    // Sleep long enough to make sure that the thread which started
+    // to print an error report will finish doing it.
+    SleepForSeconds(Max(100, flags()->sleep_before_dying + 1));
 
-      // If we're still not dead for some reason, use raw _exit() instead of
-      // Die() to bypass any additional checks.
-      internal__exit(common_flags()->exitcode);
-    } else {
-      // The other thread will eventually finish reporting
-      // so it's safe to wait
-      lock_.Lock();
-    }
-
-    StartReporting();
+    // If we're still not dead for some reason, use raw _exit() instead of
+    // Die() to bypass any additional checks.
+    internal__exit(common_flags()->exitcode);
   }
 
   ~ScopedInErrorReport() {
@@ -216,13 +213,13 @@
     if (!halt_on_error_)
       internal_memset(&current_error_, 0, sizeof(current_error_));
 
-    CommonSanitizerReportMutex.Unlock();
-    reporting_thread_tid_ = kInvalidTid;
-    lock_.Unlock();
     if (halt_on_error_) {
       Report("ABORTING\n");
       Die();
     }
+
+    atomic_store_relaxed(&reporting_thread_tid_, kInvalidTid);
+    CommonSanitizerReportMutex.Unlock();
   }
 
   void ReportError(const ErrorDescription &description) {
@@ -237,27 +234,24 @@
 
  private:
   void StartReporting() {
+    CommonSanitizerReportMutex.Lock();
     // Make sure the registry and sanitizer report mutexes are locked while
     // we're printing an error report.
     // We can lock them only here to avoid self-deadlock in case of
     // recursive reports.
     asanThreadRegistry().Lock();
-    CommonSanitizerReportMutex.Lock();
-    reporting_thread_tid_ = GetCurrentTidOrInvalid();
-    Printf("===================================================="
-           "=============\n");
+    Printf(
+        "=================================================================\n");
   }
 
-  static StaticSpinMutex lock_;
-  static u32 reporting_thread_tid_;
+  static atomic_uint32_t reporting_thread_tid_;
   // Error currently being reported. This enables the destructor to interact
   // with the debugger and point it to an error description.
   static ErrorDescription current_error_;
   bool halt_on_error_;
 };
 
-StaticSpinMutex ScopedInErrorReport::lock_;
-u32 ScopedInErrorReport::reporting_thread_tid_ = kInvalidTid;
+atomic_uint32_t ScopedInErrorReport::reporting_thread_tid_ = {kInvalidTid};
 ErrorDescription ScopedInErrorReport::current_error_;
 
 void ReportDeadlySignal(const SignalContext &sig) {
Index: compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/Posix/concurent_overflow.cc
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/Posix/concurent_overflow.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// RUN: %clangxx_asan -O0 -w %s -o %t && not %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+static void *start_routine(void *arg) {
+  volatile int *counter = (volatile int *)arg;
+  char buf[8];
+  __atomic_sub_fetch(counter, 1, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
+  while (*counter)
+    ;
+  buf[0] = buf[9];
+  return 0;
+}
+
+int main(void) {
+  const int n_threads = 8;
+  int i, counter = n_threads;
+  pthread_t thread;
+
+  for (i = 0; i < n_threads; ++i)
+    pthread_create(&thread, NULL, &start_routine, (void *)&counter);
+  sleep(5);
+  return 0;
+}
+
+// CHECK-NOT: nested bug