diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -9208,9 +9208,6 @@
                          0))
     return SDValue();
 
-  if (!ScalarV.hasOneUse())
-    return SDValue();
-
   // If the AVL is zero, operand 0 will be returned. So it's not safe to fold.
   // FIXME: We might be able to improve this if operand 0 is undef.
   if (!isNonZeroAVL(Reduce.getOperand(5)))
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fold-binary-reduce.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fold-binary-reduce.ll
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fold-binary-reduce.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/fold-binary-reduce.ll
@@ -282,13 +282,12 @@
 ; CHECK-LABEL: reduce_fadd4:
 ; CHECK:       # %bb.0: # %entry
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    vsetivli zero, 4, e32, m1, ta, ma
-; CHECK-NEXT:    vmv.s.x v10, zero
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vfmv.s.f v10, fa0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    vfredusum.vs v8, v8, v10
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    vfmv.f.s fa5, v8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    vfredusum.vs v8, v9, v10
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vfmv.s.f v8, fa1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vfredusum.vs v8, v9, v8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    vfmv.f.s fa4, v8
-; CHECK-NEXT:    fadd.s fa5, fa5, fa0
-; CHECK-NEXT:    fadd.s fa4, fa4, fa1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    fdiv.s fa0, fa5, fa4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
 entry: