Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp =================================================================== --- llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp +++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp @@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ // unecessary function-local metadata. Remember that we've seen a // dbg.assign for each variable fragment for the untracked store handling // (after this loop). - SmallSet VarHasDbgAssignForStore; + SmallSet VarHasDbgAssignForStore; for (DbgAssignIntrinsic *DAI : at::getAssignmentMarkers(ToDelete)) { - VarHasDbgAssignForStore.insert(DebugVariable(DAI)); + VarHasDbgAssignForStore.insert(DebugVariableAggregate(DAI)); DbgAssignsToDelete->insert(DAI); DIB.insertDbgValueIntrinsic(DAI->getValue(), DAI->getVariable(), DAI->getExpression(), DAI->getDebugLoc(), @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ // size) or one that is trackable but has had its DIAssignID attachment // dropped accidentally. for (auto *DAI : DbgAssigns) { - if (VarHasDbgAssignForStore.contains(DebugVariable(DAI))) + if (VarHasDbgAssignForStore.contains(DebugVariableAggregate(DAI))) continue; ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue(DAI, ToDelete, DIB); } Index: llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/assignment-tracking/mem2reg/store-to-part-of-alloca.ll =================================================================== --- /dev/null +++ llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/assignment-tracking/mem2reg/store-to-part-of-alloca.ll @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +; RUN: opt -passes=mem2reg -S %s -o - | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not="call void @llvm.dbg" + +; CHECK: llvm.dbg.value(metadata i64 0, metadata ![[#]], metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32)) + +;; The store has a debug intrinsic attached to it with a fragment size +;; different to the base alloca debug intrinsic fragment size. Check that +;; mem2reg doesn't think this store is "untagged" for that base variable. If +;; that were the case mem2reg would insert a dbg.value covering the entire +;; variable, which isn't the right thing to do here. This example looks weird +;; and not particularly compelling, but this was encountered in the wild on +;; "real code". + +;; Reduced from this C++ (which itself has been reduced). +;; class a { +;; public: +;; a(float, float); +;; }; +;; class d { +;; protected: +;; float b[4]; +;; +;; public: +;; float e() { return b[0]; } +;; float f() { return b[1]; } +;; }; +;; class g : public d { +;; public: +;; void operator*=(g) { +;; { +;; float __attribute__((nodebug)) c = b[2], __attribute__((nodebug)) h = b[0]; +;; b[0] = c; +;; b[1] = h; +;; } +;; } +;; }; +;; g get(); +;; void i() { +;; g __attribute__((nodebug)) j = get(); +;; g k = j; +;; k *= j; +;; a(k.e(), k.f()); +;; } + +define dso_local i64 @_Z3funv() #0 !dbg !10 { +entry: + %retval.sroa.0 = alloca i64, align 8, !DIAssignID !20 + call void @llvm.dbg.assign(metadata i1 undef, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression(), metadata !20, metadata ptr %retval.sroa.0, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !21 + store i64 0, ptr %retval.sroa.0, align 8, !dbg !22, !DIAssignID !23 + call void @llvm.dbg.assign(metadata i64 0, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32), metadata !23, metadata ptr %retval.sroa.0, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !21 + ret i64 0 +} + +declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata, metadata, metadata) #1 +declare void @llvm.dbg.assign(metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata, metadata) #1 + +!llvm.dbg.cu = !{!0} +!llvm.module.flags = !{!2, !3, !4, !5, !6, !7, !8} +!llvm.ident = !{!9} + +!0 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14, file: !1, producer: "clang version 17.0.0", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0, emissionKind: FullDebug, splitDebugInlining: false, nameTableKind: None) +!1 = !DIFile(filename: "test.cpp", directory: "/") +!2 = !{i32 7, !"Dwarf Version", i32 5} +!3 = !{i32 2, !"Debug Info Version", i32 3} +!4 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4} +!5 = !{i32 8, !"PIC Level", i32 2} +!6 = !{i32 7, !"PIE Level", i32 2} +!7 = !{i32 7, !"uwtable", i32 2} +!8 = !{i32 7, !"debug-info-assignment-tracking", i1 true} +!9 = !{!"clang version 17.0.0"} +!10 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "fun", linkageName: "_Z3funv", scope: !1, file: !1, line: 2, type: !11, scopeLine: 2, flags: DIFlagPrototyped | DIFlagAllCallsDescribed, spFlags: DISPFlagDefinition | DISPFlagOptimized, unit: !0, retainedNodes: !18) +!11 = !DISubroutineType(types: !12) +!12 = !{!13} +!13 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "Pair", file: !1, line: 1, size: 64, flags: DIFlagTypePassByValue, elements: !14, identifier: "_ZTS4Pair") +!14 = !{!15, !17} +!15 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_member, name: "A", scope: !13, file: !1, line: 1, baseType: !16, size: 32) +!16 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed) +!17 = !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_member, name: "B", scope: !13, file: !1, line: 1, baseType: !16, size: 32, offset: 32) +!18 = !{!19} +!19 = !DILocalVariable(name: "X", scope: !10, file: !1, line: 3, type: !13) +!20 = distinct !DIAssignID() +!21 = !DILocation(line: 0, scope: !10) +!22 = !DILocation(line: 3, column: 8, scope: !10) +!23 = distinct !DIAssignID() +!24 = !DILocation(line: 4, column: 3, scope: !10) Index: llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/assignment-tracking/sroa/vec-2.ll =================================================================== --- llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/assignment-tracking/sroa/vec-2.ll +++ llvm/test/DebugInfo/Generic/assignment-tracking/sroa/vec-2.ll @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ ;; There's a few dbg intrinsics we're not interested in testing wedged in here. ; CHECK-NEXT: dbg.value ; CHECK-NEXT: dbg.value -; CHECK-NEXT: dbg.value ; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata float %2,{{.+}}, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 96, 32)) %class.d = type { %class.a }