Index: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst =================================================================== --- clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst +++ clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst @@ -356,6 +356,9 @@ `Issue 51227 `_. - Fix the bug of inserting the ``ZeroInitializationFixit`` before the template argument list of ``VarTemplateSpecializationDecl``. +- Fix crash on invalid code when looking up a destructor in a templated class + inside a namespace. This fixes + `Issue 59446 `_. Improvements to Clang's diagnostics ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp =================================================================== --- clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp +++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ // // also looks for type-name in the scope. Unfortunately, we can't // reasonably apply this fallback for dependent nested-name-specifiers. - if (SS.getScopeRep()->getPrefix()) { + if (SS.isValid() && SS.getScopeRep()->getPrefix()) { if (ParsedType T = LookupInScope()) { Diag(SS.getEndLoc(), diag::ext_qualified_dtor_named_in_lexical_scope) << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(SS.getRange()); Index: clang/test/SemaCXX/GH59446.cpp =================================================================== --- /dev/null +++ clang/test/SemaCXX/GH59446.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s + +namespace GH59446 { // expected-note {{to match this '{'}} +namespace N { + template struct X ; // expected-note 2 {{template is declared here}} + // expected-note@-1 {{'N::X' declared here}} + // expected-note@-2 {{non-type declaration found by destructor name lookup}} + } + void f(X *x) { // expected-error {{no template named 'X'; did you mean 'N::X'}} + x->N::X::~X(); // expected-error 2 {{implicit instantiation of undefined template 'GH59446::N::X'}} + // expected-error@-1 {{identifier 'X' after '~' in destructor name does not name a type}} +} // expected-error {{expected '}'}}