diff --git a/libcxx/include/__bit_reference b/libcxx/include/__bit_reference --- a/libcxx/include/__bit_reference +++ b/libcxx/include/__bit_reference @@ -1114,28 +1114,26 @@ #endif {} - // avoid re-declaring a copy constructor for the non-const version. - using __type_for_copy_to_const = - _If<_IsConst, __bit_iterator<_Cp, false>, struct __private_nat>; - + // When _IsConst=false, this is the copy constructor. + // It is non-trivial. Making it trivial would break ABI. + // When _IsConst=true, this is a converting constructor; + // the copy and move constructors are implicitly generated + // and trivial. _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY - __bit_iterator(const __type_for_copy_to_const& __it) _NOEXCEPT + __bit_iterator(const __bit_iterator<_Cp, false>& __it) _NOEXCEPT : __seg_(__it.__seg_), __ctz_(__it.__ctz_) {} - // The non-const __bit_iterator has historically had a non-trivial - // copy constructor (as a quirk of its construction). We need to maintain - // this for ABI purposes. - using __type_for_abi_non_trivial_copy_ctor = - _If; - - _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY - __bit_iterator(__type_for_abi_non_trivial_copy_ctor const& __it) _NOEXCEPT - : __seg_(__it.__seg_), __ctz_(__it.__ctz_) {} - - // Always declare the copy assignment operator since the implicit declaration - // is deprecated. + // When _IsConst=false, we have a user-provided copy constructor, + // so we must also provide a copy assignment operator because + // the implicit generation of a defaulted one is deprecated. + // When _IsConst=true, the assignment operators are + // implicitly generated and trivial. _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY - __bit_iterator& operator=(__bit_iterator const&) = default; + __bit_iterator& operator=(const _If<_IsConst, struct __private_nat, __bit_iterator>& __it) { + __seg_ = __it.__seg_; + __ctz_ = __it.__ctz_; + return *this; + } _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY reference operator*() const _NOEXCEPT {return reference(__seg_, __storage_type(1) << __ctz_);} diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/experimental/language.support/support.coroutines/end.to.end/expected.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/experimental/language.support/support.coroutines/end.to.end/expected.pass.cpp --- a/libcxx/test/std/experimental/language.support/support.coroutines/end.to.end/expected.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/experimental/language.support/support.coroutines/end.to.end/expected.pass.cpp @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct promise_type { std::shared_ptr data; - std::shared_ptr get_return_object() { data = std::make_shared(); return data; } + expected get_return_object() { data = std::make_shared(); return {data}; } suspend_never initial_suspend() { return {}; } suspend_never final_suspend() noexcept { return {}; } void return_value(T v) { data->val = v; data->error = {}; } diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/deduct.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/deduct.pass.cpp --- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/deduct.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/deduct.pass.cpp @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ // GCC's implementation of class template deduction is still immature and runs // into issues with libc++. However GCC accepts this code when compiling // against libstdc++. -// XFAIL: gcc-5, gcc-6, gcc-7 +// XFAIL: gcc-5, gcc-6, gcc-7, gcc-8, gcc-9, gcc-10, gcc-11 //