Change Details

Octeon branches (//bbit0/bbit032/bbit1/bbit132//) have an immediate operand, so it it legal to have such replacement within MipsBranchExpansion::replaceBranch(). According to the specification, a branch (e.g. bbit0 ) looks like: bbit0 rs p offset // p is an immediate operand if !rs<p> then branch Without this patch, an assertion triggers in the method, and the problem has been found in the real example.

Octeon branches (//bbit0/bbit032/bbit1/bbit132//) have an immediate operand, so it is legal to have such replacement within MipsBranchExpansion::replaceBranch(). According to the specification, a branch (e.g. bbit0 ) looks like: bbit0 rs p offset // p is an immediate operand if !rs<p> then branch Without this patch, an assertion triggers in the method, and the problem has been found in the real example.

Octeon branches (//bbit0/bbit032/bbit1/bbit132//) have an immediate operand, so it its legal to have such replacement within MipsBranchExpansion::replaceBranch(). According to the specification, a branch (e.g. bbit0 ) looks like: bbit0 rs p offset // p is an immediate operand if !rs<p> then branch Without this patch, an assertion triggers in the method, and the problem has been found in the real example.