- User Since
- Dec 11 2019, 7:43 PM (69 w, 4 d)
Feb 1 2021
Jan 29 2021
Jan 24 2021
Jan 19 2021
Hi, I have a question about this patch. I appreciate any answers. Thanks!
Jan 18 2021
Jan 16 2021
Jan 14 2021
Update following suggestions and clang-format.
Jan 13 2021
Jan 12 2021
Jan 11 2021
Jan 8 2021
Jan 7 2021
Not sure what is the problem... Remove profile support to make this patch as simple as possible.
Remove modification on the candidates of profilers.
Leave only modification on the candidates of crt and rebase.
Add explanations too.
Jan 6 2021
Jan 5 2021
A few more modificating candidates to make code better.
Update comments in header file comment which I've forgotten to modify.
Change following suggestions. Also rebase to main.
Jan 4 2021
Change to use Op.getSimpleValueType() as suggested.
Update following suggestions.
Update following suggestions. Use TLI.getPoitnerTy() this time since
lsda expansion uses machine value type (MVT) instead of value type
structure (EVT) here. Using EVT may require some conversions later.
Dec 27 2020
Dec 26 2020
We are using this patch in llvm/clang for VE and the patch is really helpful to implement intrinsic instructions using vector mask registers. This works fine in backend since backend supports vXi1. I wish people working on clang think this patch is reasonable.
Dec 25 2020
I think we need more reviewer working on not only VVP but also VP to review this patch.
Dec 23 2020
Dec 22 2020
Dec 21 2020
This is what I feel when I see this test. Just a thought. Not a requirement. But, I think it's possible to improve this test in that way.
Dec 18 2020
Update following a suggestion.
Thank you for comment.