- User Since
- Mon, Mar 29, 6:02 AM (3 w, 2 d)
Wed, Apr 14
that's now https://reviews.llvm.org/D100484
Fri, Apr 9
here in the same place, or in a different merge request?
Thu, Apr 1
discarded the first approach, and used the proposed approach. I added this close to the ignoring of the -ffat-lto-objects option. Please let me know if there's a better location. Builds and works as expected:
do you mean, just discard the current patch, and just list those as unsupported?